The Trusted Source for Gaming Services

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Accounts SitesBuy or sell game accounts
    • Betting SitesSkin betting & wagering sites
    • Boosting SitesRank up fast with pro players
    • Cases SitesCase opening & unboxing sites
    • Currency SitesGame key stores & resellers
    • Keys SitesGame key stores & resellers
    • Rewards SitesEarn platforms & gift cards
    • Trading SitesSkins, items & digital goods
  • Game
    • Apex LegendsApex Legends SitesView the websites belonging to Apex Legends
    • Counter-Strike 2Counter-Strike 2 SitesView the websites belonging to Counter-Strike 2
    • Dota 2Dota 2 SitesView the websites belonging to Dota 2
    • FortniteFortnite SitesView the websites belonging to Fortnite
    • Genshin ImpactGenshin Impact SitesView the websites belonging to Genshin Impact
    • League of LegendsLeague of Legends SitesView the websites belonging to League of Legends
    • OverwatchOverwatch SitesView the websites belonging to Overwatch
    • RobloxRoblox SitesView the websites belonging to Roblox
    • RustRust SitesView the websites belonging to Rust
    • Team Fortress 2Team Fortress 2 SitesView the websites belonging to Team Fortress 2
    • ValorantValorant SitesView the websites belonging to Valorant
    • World of WarcraftWorld of Warcraft SitesView the websites belonging to World of Warcraft
  • Blog

Contact now

The Trusted Source for Gaming Services

CS2 Float Values Explained: Why They Affect What You Pay

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

Every CS2 skin has a float value – a number between 0.00 and 1.00 that determines its exact visual condition. This number is set permanently when the skin drops or gets unboxed. It never changes, no matter how many times the skin is traded.

Float value is the single biggest hidden factor in CS2 skin pricing. Two skins can share the same name, the same wear label, and look nearly identical in a marketplace thumbnail – but one costs $50 and the other costs $500. The difference is almost always float.

The 5 wear ranges

Every CS2 skin falls into one of five wear categories based on its float value:

Wear Category Abbreviation Float Range What It Looks Like
Factory New FN 0.00 – 0.07 Minimal to no visible scratches or wear
Minimal Wear MW 0.07 – 0.15 Slight wear marks, often hard to spot in-game
Field-Tested FT 0.15 – 0.38 Noticeable scratches, moderate paint removal
Well-Worn WW 0.38 – 0.45 Heavy scratching, significant paint loss
Battle-Scarred BS 0.45 – 1.00 Extensive damage, large areas of paint stripped

The category label is what you see on the Steam Community Market and most trading sites. But the label tells you the range – not where the skin actually sits within that range. A Field-Tested skin at 0.15 looks dramatically different from one at 0.37, even though both say “FT.”

Not every skin can exist at every float

This trips up a lot of buyers. Each skin in CS2 has a minimum and maximum possible float value defined by Valve. The AK-47 Redline, for example, has a minimum float of 0.10 and a maximum of 0.70 – it physically cannot be Factory New. The AWP Asiimov has a minimum float of 0.18, so it only exists as Field-Tested, Well-Worn, or Battle-Scarred.

Before you search for a Factory New version of any skin, check whether that skin can even roll below 0.07. If the minimum float is 0.06, the “Factory New” version you’re buying is already at the very top of the FN range and will have visible wear marks.

How float drives price

The relationship between float and price isn’t a smooth curve. It’s driven by two forces: visual quality and rarity at the extremes.

Within a wear category, lower float means higher price. A Factory New AWP Dragon Lore at 0.01 is worth considerably more than one at 0.06. Both carry the FN label. The 0.01 is visually flawless. The 0.06 has minor scratches visible under close inspection.

The category boundary creates a price cliff. A skin at 0.0699 (top of Factory New) and one at 0.0701 (bottom of Minimal Wear) can look almost identical. But the FN label commands a premium – sometimes 30-50% more – for that one data point difference. Buyers pay for the label, not the pixels.

Extreme low floats enter collector territory. Below 0.005, and especially below 0.001, skins become collectibles. A 0.0001 float skin is functionally unique. The lowest-float examples of popular skins sell for 5-10x the price of a “normal” Factory New. For high-demand items like AK-47 Fire Serpent or M4A1-S Hot Rod, sub-0.001 specimens can go for 20x or more.

Battle-Scarred extremes have their own market. On certain skins, a float above 0.95 creates a distinctive stripped look that collectors seek out. A 0.999 AWP Asiimov – nearly all base metal, almost no paint – is rarer and more expensive than a 0.45 Battle-Scarred one. The meme value is real, and it carries a real price tag.

Here’s how float typically affects pricing on a mid-range skin:

Float Value Wear Label Approximate Price Impact
0.001 Factory New +200-500% over baseline FN
0.01 Factory New +50-100%
0.03 Factory New +10-20%
0.06 Factory New Baseline FN price
0.08 Minimal Wear 15-25% below FN
0.15 Field-Tested 30-50% below FN
0.38 Well-Worn 50-65% below FN
0.90+ Battle-Scarred Variable – collector premium possible

These percentages shift based on the skin. Knives and high-demand rifles (AK-47 Case Hardened, AWP Dragon Lore) have steeper float premiums. Sub-$10 skins see minimal float-based price differences.

Pattern index: the other variable

Float isn’t the only hidden number that affects price. Every skin also has a pattern index (sometimes called paint seed) – a value from 0 to 999 that determines the visual pattern distribution on the skin’s surface.

For most skins, pattern index doesn’t matter. But for a handful of high-value skins, it’s the primary price driver:

  • Case Hardened – the AK-47, Five-SeveN, and knife variants all have 1,000 possible patterns. Patterns with more blue (“Blue Gems”) sell for 10x to 100x more than average patterns at the same float. Pattern #661 on the AK-47 Case Hardened is the most famous example – a near-full blue top that regularly sells for tens of thousands of dollars.
  • Fade – knives and the Glock-18 Fade are valued by how far the color gradient extends. A “full fade” (pattern with maximum pink/purple coverage) is worth significantly more than a partial fade.
  • Marble Fade – “Fire and Ice” patterns (red and blue only, no yellow) command the highest premiums among Marble Fade knives.
  • Crimson Web – the number and centering of web patterns on Crimson Web knives directly affect value. A centered big web on a Karambit Crimson Web can double the price.

CSFloat displays pattern index data alongside float values on every listing – this is the go-to resource for checking pattern-sensitive skins.

Where to check float values on trading sites

Not every CS2 trading site gives you the same level of float data. Here’s what the major platforms offer:

CSFloat is built around float data. The platform started as FloatDB – a database indexing over 1.6 billion CS2 skins by float value, paint seed, and sticker combination. Every listing shows the precise float, and you can filter and sort by float range. The 3D inspect screenshots let you see exactly how the skin looks before buying. If float precision is your priority, CSFloat has the most comprehensive toolset.

Skinport displays float values on all listings with inspect links so you can verify in-game appearance. Sorting by float is available, though the filtering is less granular than CSFloat’s dedicated tools. For most buyers who want to check float before purchasing, Skinport covers the basics.

Tradeit.gg shows float values on listings. The bot-based model means you’re buying from platform inventory, so what you see is what you get – the float displayed is the float you’ll receive.

Steam Community Market technically has float data, but you need a third-party browser extension (like CSFloat’s Market Checker) to see it. Without the extension, you’re buying blind.

Practical float-buying tips

  1. Set a float range before you start browsing. If you want a clean-looking skin but don’t need a collector piece, the 0.01-0.03 range for Factory New gives you an excellent appearance without the extreme float premium.
  2. Check the skin’s possible float range first. If the minimum float is 0.06 for the skin you want, the FN version will always have some visible wear. A low-float Minimal Wear at 0.07 might actually look cleaner than a high-float Factory New at 0.069 on certain skins – and cost less.
  3. Compare float-to-price across platforms. The same skin at the same float can be listed at different prices on Skinport vs CSFloat. Checking both before buying takes 30 seconds and can save meaningful money on items above $50.
  4. Don’t overpay for float differences you can’t see. In-game, the visual difference between 0.01 and 0.02 float is often invisible – especially during gameplay. The price difference can be 30-50%. Unless you’re collecting, buy for the look you want, not the lowest possible number.
  5. For expensive purchases, always use inspect screenshots. Float is a number, but what you care about is how the skin actually looks. Two skins at 0.03 float can look slightly different depending on where the wear maps onto the model. Platforms with 3D inspect tools let you verify before you buy.

Browse all CS2 trading sites to compare platforms with detailed float data and find skins at the float range you’re looking for.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Guides

Top-Rated Gaming Sites in 2026, Ranked by Trust

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

There are hundreds of sites where you can trade skins, buy game currency, get rank boosted, or earn free gift cards. Most of them want your money. Some of them deserve it.

Tested.gg tracks over 160 gaming service platforms across 8 categories. Every site gets a Trust Score from 0 to 100, recalculated daily from community reviews, security audits, traffic data, and operator transparency. The Verified badge means we’ve completed real-money purchase tests – not just read the marketing page.

This is the 2026 cross-category ranking. One top-rated site per category, with runners-up and the context you need to decide for yourself.

The Leaderboard

Category Top-Rated Site Trust Score
Trading Skinport 97 Visit Site
Rewards EarnLab 96 Visit Site
Accounts Probemas 91 Visit Site
Boosting Probemas 91 Visit Site
Currency Probemas 91 Visit Site
Keys LootBar 90 Visit Site
Betting CSGOEmpire 84 Visit Site
Cases CSGO-SKINS.COM 82 Visit Site

Probemas appears three times because it genuinely tops three categories. That’s unusual – most multi-category platforms sacrifice depth for breadth. Probemas doesn’t.

Now the individual breakdowns.

Trading: Skinport (Trust Score: 97)

Skinport has held the top trading spot since we started tracking. The numbers back it up: 4.8/5 Trustpilot from 35,000+ reviews, ~3.5M monthly visits, and roughly 3 million active listings across CS2, Dota 2, Rust, and TF2.

The seller fee is 8% on items under €1,000 (6% above). That’s not cheap – CSFloat charges 2% and BUFF Market charges 2.5%. But Skinport’s pitch isn’t low fees. It’s everything else: 0% buyer fee, instant bot delivery, free SEPA withdrawals in 1-3 business days, and a German GmbH with EU consumer protection. You pay more per transaction. You get a platform that just works.

Runner-up: CSFloat at Trust Score 96. If fees matter more than convenience, CSFloat’s 2% seller commission and FloatDB toolset make it the trader’s platform. 10.4M monthly visits give it the highest traffic in the category. The tiered withdrawal fee (0.5-2.5% based on lifetime volume) is the only wrinkle.

See all trading sites ranked by Trust Score.

Rewards: EarnLab (Trust Score: 96)

EarnLab launched in 2023 and climbed to the top of the rewards category faster than any platform we’ve tracked. Trust Score 96, Malta-registered operator, and payout rates that consistently beat the competition across offer walls, surveys, and video tasks.

What separates EarnLab from the crowded rewards space: transparent earning rates, multiple withdrawal options (PayPal, crypto, gift cards), and fast processing times. The interface is clean – no popup spam, no dark patterns pushing you toward low-value tasks. It does what a rewards platform should do and skips the noise.

Runners-up: CashInStyle at 92 (US-registered, strong payout rates), Freecash at 90 (largest user base in the category with 270K+ reviews), and Swagbucks at 90 (the veteran – operating since 2008 with Prodege LLC backing).

See all rewards sites ranked by Trust Score.

Accounts: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)

Probemas is a multi-category platform covering accounts, boosting, and currency across games including WoW, Valorant, League of Legends, and more. Its Trust Score of 91 puts it at the top of all three categories – a rare feat that reflects consistent quality across service types rather than specialization in one.

The operator is publicly registered with full contact information. User reviews highlight reliable delivery, responsive support, and competitive pricing. For account buying specifically, the verified status means we’ve completed real purchases and confirmed delivery integrity.

Runner-up: Chicks Gold at 82. Established multi-game marketplace with accounts, currency, and items. Broader game coverage but a more variable review profile.

See all account sites ranked by Trust Score.

Boosting: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)

Probemas tops boosting with the same score of 91. If you want a dedicated boosting-only service, the alternatives are worth knowing.

Boosting Factory at 88 is a specialized boosting operation – LoL, Valorant, WoW, TFT, and Wild Rift with 24/7 support and a self-play option. Overgear at 88 runs the marketplace model – you pick from multiple boosters competing on price and completion time. Both are strong platforms that compete on specialization where Probemas competes on breadth.

For WoW-specific boosting, Overgear’s marketplace depth is hard to beat. For LoL and Valorant, Boosting Factory’s dedicated teams have the edge. Probemas is the generalist that scores highest overall.

See all boosting sites ranked by Trust Score.

Currency: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)

Third category, same leader. Probemas at 91 covers in-game currency across multiple titles with consistent delivery and pricing.

But currency buying is game-specific, and the runners-up matter here. For WoW gold, Overgear (88) and MmoGah (88) are the established go-to platforms – Overgear with marketplace pricing, MmoGah with direct inventory and bulk discounts. LootBar at 90 doubles as a currency and key store, with competitive rates especially for mobile game top-ups. misti.services at 82 has been operating since 2013 – one of the longest track records in the category.

See all currency sites ranked by Trust Score.

Keys: LootBar (Trust Score: 90)

LootBar tops the key store category at 90. It’s a dual-purpose platform – game keys and in-game currency – which gives it broader appeal than pure key resellers. Competitive pricing and a clean purchase flow.

For authorized key stores specifically, Humble Bundle at 80 is unmatched. Every key comes directly from publishers – zero revocation risk, period. The tradeoff is less aggressive discounting compared to grey-market sellers. Instant Gaming at 80 offers deeper discounts with a French-registered operator and 7.1M monthly visits.

The key store category is split between authorized retailers (Humble, Green Man Gaming at 75, Fanatical at 75) and marketplace/reseller models (Kinguin at 62, G2A at 55). Trust Scores reflect that divide – authorized stores consistently score higher.

See all key stores ranked by Trust Score.

Betting: CSGOEmpire (Trust Score: 84)

CSGOEmpire leads the betting category at 84. The category overall scores lower than trading or rewards – the nature of skin gambling means fewer verified operators, less transparent house edges, and higher variance in user experiences.

CSGOEmpire has been operating since 2016 with a Curaçao gaming license. It offers coin flip, match betting, and roulette with CS2 skin deposits and withdrawals. The provably fair system is documented and verifiable.

The gap between CSGOEmpire and the next-highest betting site is significant. This is a category where Trust Scores cluster in the 40-65 range, and 84 stands well above the pack.

See all betting sites ranked by Trust Score.

Cases: CSGO-SKINS.COM (Trust Score: 82)

CSGO-SKINS.COM tops the case opening category at 82. Case sites are the highest-risk category on the platform – the house always has an edge, and long-term expected value is negative by design.

That said, CSGO-SKINS.COM has documented provably fair mechanics, instant skin delivery, and a consistent user base. SkinRave.GG at 72 is the runner-up with a Cyprus-registered operator.

We include case sites because users search for them and deserve honest Trust Score data rather than unranked affiliate pages. But the editorial position is clear: case opening is entertainment spending, not investment.

See all case opening sites ranked by Trust Score.

What the Numbers Tell You

Three patterns stand out across all categories:

Specialization correlates with trust. The highest-scoring sites in each category tend to do one or two things well rather than everything adequately. Skinport dominates trading. EarnLab dominates rewards. The exceptions – like Probemas across three categories – are rare.

Operator transparency predicts score. Every site above 85 has a publicly registered business entity, a real address, and responsive support. The sites clustering in the 40-65 range almost always have anonymous or offshore operators.

Category risk varies dramatically. Trading and rewards sites average Trust Scores in the 70-90 range. Betting and case sites average 45-65. That’s not bias – it reflects the structural differences in how these businesses operate and how users experience them.

Trust Scores update daily. If a site improves its security, earns more positive reviews, or gains traffic, its score rises. If it deteriorates, the score drops – and we’ve removed Verified status from sites that failed re-evaluation.

Browse the full directory of all gaming service sites ranked by Trust Score, or filter by game and category to find exactly what you need.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Rankings

Cheapest WoW Gold Sites in 2026

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

WoW gold prices vary more than most buyers realize. The same 100,000 gold on the same server can cost anywhere from $5 to $9 depending on where you buy it – and that’s before factoring in delivery speed, delivery method, and the risk profile of the site you’re using.

With TBC Classic launching in January 2026 and The War Within driving steady retail demand, gold sites are competing harder than they have in years. We compared prices per 10,000 gold across 7 sites, checked delivery methods, and pulled Trust Scores to rank the cheapest options that are actually worth using.

Methodology: Ranked by price per 10,000 gold on US retail servers (WoW Midnight/The War Within). Prices checked in March 2026 and represent typical non-promotional rates. Delivery speed and Trust Score are secondary ranking factors where prices are comparable.

Price Comparison Table

Rank Site Price per 10K Gold (est.) Delivery Method Delivery Speed Trust Score
1 G2G ~$0.55-$0.65 Face-to-face, AH, Mail 5-60 min 72
2 Eldorado ~$0.58-$0.68 Face-to-face, AH 1-30 min 76
3 MmoGah ~$0.60-$0.70 Face-to-face, AH, Mail 5-30 min 88
4 IGGM ~$0.62-$0.72 Mail, AH 5-60 min 83
5 Overgear ~$0.70-$0.85 Face-to-face 15-60 min 88
6 Chicks Gold ~$0.70-$0.90 Face-to-face 10-60 min 82
7 LootBar N/A N/A N/A 90

Note: LootBar is included because it frequently appears in WoW gold searches, but it does not sell WoW gold. LootBar specializes in mobile and PC game top-ups (Genshin Impact, Valorant, Clash of Clans). If you’re looking for WoW gold, the other six sites on this list are your options.

1. G2G (Trust Score: 72) – ~$0.55-$0.65 per 10K Gold

G2G consistently offers the lowest WoW gold prices. As a P2P marketplace with 2,000+ game categories and ~7.5M monthly visits, the seller competition is fierce – and that drives prices down.

Gold delivery supports face-to-face trading, auction house, and in-game mail, depending on the seller. Delivery speed ranges from 5 minutes to an hour, with popular US servers generally landing on the faster end. The G2G Guarantee holds buyer funds in escrow until you confirm delivery.

The tradeoffs: G2G’s Trust Score of 72 is the lowest on this list. The 3.9/5 Trustpilot rating from 54,000+ reviews includes a 10% one-star rate. Seller quality varies – some are professional gold farms with instant delivery, others are individuals who may take hours to respond. The marketplace model means you’re dealing with the seller, not G2G, for fulfillment.

Seller fees are tiered by rank: 9.99% (Normal) down to 4.99% (Legendary). This affects how aggressively sellers price their gold. Buyer-side, G2G adds an undisclosed order handling fee at checkout.

Best for: Price-conscious buyers willing to vet seller ratings carefully.

Visit G2G

2. Eldorado (Trust Score: 76) – ~$0.58-$0.68 per 10K Gold

Eldorado is the second-cheapest option and arguably the fastest. With ~9.5M monthly visits, it has the highest traffic of any platform on this list. Currency delivery is frequently completed in under a minute – reviewers consistently cite speed as Eldorado’s strongest point.

The platform charges an 8% + $0.30 buyer fee on card and crypto payments. So a $10 gold purchase actually costs $11.10 at checkout. Factor that into any price comparison. The base gold rate may look competitive, but the buyer fee narrows the gap with sites like MmoGah that embed costs into their rates with no checkout-time additions.

Eldorado is EU-registered (Lithuania, UAB) with a published Vilnius address – stronger regulatory standing than Hong Kong or offshore alternatives. TradeShield escrow covers non-delivery. Klarna acceptance (buy-now-pay-later) is unusual in this category.

Delivery methods include face-to-face and auction house. Speed is the real selling point – multiple reviewers describe sub-60-second deliveries for popular servers.

Best for: Buyers who prioritize delivery speed and EU legal protections.

Visit Eldorado

3. MmoGah (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.60-$0.70 per 10K Gold

MmoGah has been selling WoW gold since 2006 – nearly 20 years of continuous operation. That track record shows in the review scores: 4.9/5 on Trustpilot from 6,300+ reviews and 4.9/5 on Reviews.io from 700+ reviews, both with 95%+ five-star rates.

Unlike G2G and Eldorado, MmoGah is a B2C direct seller. There’s no marketplace, no third-party sellers. MmoGah’s team fulfills every order. This removes the seller quality variance that’s inherent in marketplace models.

Pricing is mid-range – a few cents per 10K more than G2G or Eldorado. The premium buys you three WoW delivery methods (face-to-face, mailbox, auction house), named support agents available 24/7 via live chat, email, SMS, Skype, and Discord, and volume discounts starting around 5% at higher order amounts.

Delivery speed runs 5-30 minutes for WoW on popular servers. The auction house method is slower but reduces direct interaction with your character – a consideration for detection risk.

Best for: Buyers who want a proven, long-standing seller with flexible delivery methods.

Visit MmoGah

4. IGGM (Trust Score: 83) – ~$0.62-$0.72 per 10K Gold

IGGM is another B2C direct seller, operated by Hong Kong Game Bee Technology Co. since 2017. The standout number: 165,700+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5 with 94% five-star. That’s the highest review volume of any site on this list by a large margin.

WoW gold pricing sits slightly above MmoGah’s. The 200,000G minimum order is lower than some competitors, making IGGM accessible for smaller purchases. A VIP membership program offers up to 5% off for repeat buyers. Volume discounts kick in at 500,000G+ orders (5-8% off).

Delivery methods are mail and auction house – no face-to-face option. Buyer absorbs the AH trading fee on auction house deliveries. Delivery times range from 5-60 minutes, with delays documented for niche server currencies and event items (7-26 hour waits in some reports).

IGGM covers 50+ games beyond WoW, including OSRS, FFXIV, Path of Exile, and Diablo 4. Payment options are the broadest in this group: 20+ methods including PayPal, crypto, iDEAL, Sofort, BLIK, and GiroPay.

Best for: Buyers who want broad payment options and a high-volume, verified platform.

Visit IGGM

5. Overgear (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.70-$0.85 per 10K Gold

Overgear is primarily known as a boosting marketplace, but it also covers WoW gold through its independent seller pool. With ~1.1M monthly visits and 30+ games, it’s the largest boosting-first platform in the space.

Gold pricing runs noticeably higher than dedicated gold sellers – roughly 15-30% above G2G or MmoGah. Overgear’s own pricing has been rated ~35% above competitor average by independent reviewers. The premium reflects the marketplace model and Overgear’s positioning as a full-service platform (boosting, carries, and currency under one roof).

The upside: escrow protection on every order, PayPal acceptance (rare for boosting platforms), and a 7-year operational track record. The downside: the dispute process averages 4+ days, pricing is set by individual sellers with no fixed rate grid, and gold delivery is face-to-face only.

Best for: Buyers who are already using Overgear for boosting and want to add gold purchases without creating another account.

Visit Overgear

6. Chicks Gold (Trust Score: 82) – ~$0.70-$0.90 per 10K Gold

Chicks Gold operates a marketplace with escrow, covering 16 games including WoW, OSRS, LoL, and Valorant. Estonian registration (Tallinn) provides EU regulatory oversight – a meaningful trust signal in this category.

WoW gold pricing is on the higher end. Specific per-unit rates couldn’t be confirmed during research (Cloudflare challenge blocks automated access), but reviewer descriptions place Chicks Gold in the “competitive but not cheapest” bracket. The broader value proposition is multi-game coverage and US-friendly payment methods (Cashapp, Venmo, Zelle alongside PayPal and crypto).

Delivery is face-to-face. Support responsiveness is the documented weak point – response times of up to 3+ days have been reported, which is slow for time-sensitive gold deliveries.

Best for: US-based buyers who want multiple payment options and EU-registered buyer protection.

Visit Chicks Gold

TBC Classic Gold: A Different Market

With TBC Classic launching in January 2026, there’s a separate gold market forming around Classic servers. Classic gold prices are typically 2-5x higher per unit than retail WoW gold due to lower supply and different farming economics.

G2G, Eldorado, and MmoGah all support WoW Classic gold. IGGM covers WoW Classic as well. Pricing and availability fluctuate heavily in the weeks after a Classic expansion launch – expect premium rates and longer delivery times during the initial rush.

If you’re buying Classic gold specifically, check live prices on the day of purchase rather than relying on any comparison table. The market moves fast.

Which Site Should You Use?

On a budget: G2G and Eldorado consistently offer the lowest per-unit prices. G2G edges Eldorado on base price; Eldorado’s 8% + $0.30 buyer fee closes the gap but delivery speed is exceptional.

Want reliability over savings: MmoGah at Trust Score 88 with a nearly 20-year track record is the safest bet. You’ll pay a modest premium – a few dollars more on a typical order – but the B2C model eliminates seller variance.

Need payment flexibility: IGGM supports 20+ payment methods including regional European options. Chicks Gold adds US-specific options like Cashapp and Venmo.

Already boosting on Overgear: Adding gold to an existing Overgear order is convenient but expect to pay 15-30% more than dedicated gold sellers.

The price difference between the cheapest and most expensive option on this list is roughly $2-3 per 100,000 gold. For small orders, that’s negligible. For large purchases ahead of a raid tier or Classic launch, it adds up. Choose based on your priorities: price, speed, trust, or convenience.

Browse all WoW gold sites to compare the full directory.

Comments

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Rankings

Skinport vs DMarket: Fees, Speed, and Trust Compared

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

Skinport and DMarket both run bot-based instant delivery, both charge 0% buyer fees, and both handle CS2 skins. On paper, they look interchangeable. In practice, they serve different traders – and the differences show up the moment you try to sell something or cash out.

Skinport is the EU-regulated, SEPA-withdrawal, CS2-focused marketplace with a Trust Score of 97. DMarket is the multi-game, PayPal-and-crypto platform with a 2% seller fee and a Trust Score of 75. One charges more but gives you a cleaner path to your bank account. The other saves you money per trade but asks you to work a little harder on the back end.

Here’s where each one actually wins.

Seller fees

This is the single biggest difference, and it matters more the larger your inventory gets.

Skinport charges an 8% seller fee on items under €1,000, dropping to 6% on anything above that threshold. There’s also a 2% private sale rate, but that’s for direct trades between users, not the standard marketplace experience. Buyers pay nothing – listed price is checkout price, no hidden markups.

DMarket advertises seller fees “as low as 2%” for CS2 items, and that rate holds on standard-value skins. But there’s a catch: low-value items (below a price threshold DMarket doesn’t publicly specify) can incur fees up to 10%. For Dota 2, TF2, and Rust items, the rate is a flat 5%. Buyers also pay 0%.

The headline “2% vs 8%” is real for mid-to-high-value CS2 skins. On a $100 skin, a Skinport seller nets about $92. A DMarket seller nets about $98. That’s $6 per item – which adds up fast if you’re liquidating a whole inventory.

But the gap narrows on low-value items. If you’re listing a bunch of $2-5 skins, DMarket’s tiered fee structure can push your effective rate well above the advertised 2%. Skinport’s flat 8% is at least predictable.

Fee Type Skinport DMarket
Seller fee (standard) 8% ~2% (CS2)
Seller fee (high-value) 6% (>€1,000) ~2% (CS2)
Seller fee (low-value) 8% Up to 10%
Seller fee (Dota 2/TF2/Rust) N/A 5%
Buyer fee 0% 0%
Trade fee N/A ~2.5%
Visit Site Visit Site

Delivery and trade model

Both platforms use bot-based instant delivery, so neither requires you to wait around for a human seller to accept your trade. You buy a skin, the bot sends it, done. On Skinport, sellers deposit skins into the platform’s Steam bots upfront – the 7-day Valve trade hold has already passed by the time a buyer sees the listing. DMarket runs a similar model where listed items are immediately available.

The practical difference is minimal for buyers. You click buy, you get your skin. Neither platform requires a browser extension, and failed trades auto-refund on both.

Where the models start to diverge is on the seller side. Skinport sellers deposit items and wait for a buyer to purchase at the listed price – it’s straightforward consignment. DMarket also offers a trade function (distinct from buy/sell) with a separate ~2.5% fee, which lets you swap items directly without going through the cash cycle. If you’re the kind of trader who rotates through skins rather than cashing out, that trade feature saves a step.

Cashout and withdrawals

This is where Skinport’s simplicity becomes a double-edged sword.

Skinport offers exactly one withdrawal method: SEPA bank transfer. Zero withdrawal fee, 1-3 business days to arrive. If you have a European bank account, this is clean and cheap. If you don’t – if you’re in the US, Asia, or anywhere SEPA doesn’t reach – you’re stuck. No PayPal. No crypto withdrawal. No Visa cashout. SEPA or nothing.

DMarket gives you more options. PayPal, crypto, and bank transfers are all available, with fees varying by method (crypto charges blockchain fees, PayPal charges standard PayPal rates). For traders outside Europe, DMarket is dramatically more accessible. PayPal availability alone is a major differentiator – most CS2 marketplaces don’t offer it.

If you’re in the EU with a SEPA-compatible bank, Skinport’s zero-fee withdrawal is hard to beat. Everywhere else, DMarket wins on flexibility by a wide margin.

Traffic and liquidity

Metric Skinport DMarket
Monthly visits ~3.5M ~2.2M
Active listings ~3-3.5M Not disclosed
Games supported CS2 (some Dota 2, Rust, TF2) CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2
Trustpilot rating 4.8-4.9 / 5 (35,000+ reviews) 4.0 / 5 (21,000+ reviews)
Visit Site Visit Site

Skinport pulls ~3.5M monthly visits and lists roughly 3-3.5M items – making it the largest CS2 marketplace in Europe by listing count. That volume means your skins sell faster, especially in the popular $10-200 range.

DMarket’s ~2.2M visits are spread across four games. For CS2 specifically, the buyer pool is smaller than Skinport’s. But if you trade Dota 2, Rust, or TF2 items, DMarket is one of the few major Western marketplaces with meaningful depth in those titles. There’s no point listing your Dota 2 arcanas on Skinport – the audience isn’t there.

Trust Score and company structure

Skinport holds a Trust Score of 97, the highest among CS2 trading platforms on Tested.gg. The operator is Skinport GmbH, registered in Stuttgart, Germany (HRB 764879) – a real German limited liability company with EU consumer protection obligations. They’ve been operating since 2019, maintain a 4.8-4.9 Trustpilot rating across 35,000+ reviews, and have never had a major security incident. KYC is required for all seller withdrawals with no small-amount exemption.

DMarket’s Trust Score is 75. The operator is DMarket Inc., incorporated in Wilmington, Delaware, with an operational hub in Kyiv, Ukraine. Founded in 2017, the platform has processed over 107M cashouts. The Trustpilot rating sits at 4.0 with 21,000+ reviews – 71% five-star but 15% one-star, a notably higher negative rate than Skinport’s. The most common complaint in negative reviews involves AML-triggered account locks with reported resolution times of 3-10 months.

That TrustScore gap matters. Skinport’s German GmbH means EU regulatory oversight and a clear legal escalation path. DMarket’s Delaware incorporation is a US holding structure, but the operational team is Ukraine-based – which adds geopolitical considerations and can complicate support escalation for large disputes.

User sentiment

What Skinport users praise: instant delivery, 0% buyer fee, clean UI, EU compliance, consistent support, and active Trustpilot engagement.

What Skinport users complain about: KYC delays (the most common issue – can take days and blocks withdrawals during review), bot sniping of underpriced listings, SEPA-only cashout, and a 100-item listing cap.

What DMarket users praise: fast transactions, competitive pricing vs Steam Market, instant delivery, large multi-game inventory, PayPal availability, and wide payment selection.

What DMarket users complain about: AML-triggered account locks (the dominant negative theme – with funds frozen for months), poor communication during lockouts, payout rate changes after trade execution, and deposit processing failures.

The pattern is clear. Skinport’s complaints are mostly about limitations (KYC waits, SEPA only). DMarket’s complaints are more structural – accounts locked with funds inaccessible for extended periods is a fundamentally different kind of problem.

Who should use Skinport

Use Skinport if you:

  • Have a SEPA-compatible bank account
  • Trade primarily CS2 skins
  • Want the highest Trust Score in the category (97)
  • Buy more than you sell (0% buyer fee, and the 8% seller fee doesn’t affect purchases)
  • Prefer a predictable flat fee over variable rates
  • Value EU legal protections and regulatory oversight

Who should use DMarket

Use DMarket if you:

  • Need PayPal or crypto withdrawals (SEPA isn’t an option for you)
  • Trade across multiple games (CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2)
  • Sell regularly and want to keep the 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items
  • Use the trade feature to rotate skins without cashing out
  • Are comfortable with the platform’s AML review risk

The bottom line

For CS2 buyers in Europe, Skinport is the stronger platform. Zero buyer fees, instant delivery, a Trust Score of 97, and a straight line from sold item to your bank account via SEPA. The 8% seller fee is the premium you pay for that simplicity.

For sellers chasing lower fees, multi-game traders, or anyone outside the SEPA zone, DMarket makes more financial sense. The 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items is genuinely competitive, and PayPal/crypto withdrawals open the platform to a global audience that Skinport’s SEPA-only policy locks out.

Neither platform is universally better. The right choice depends on where your bank is, what games you trade, and whether you’re primarily buying or selling. For the full directory, see all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score on Tested.gg.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Comparisons

CS.MONEY vs Tradeit.gg: CS2 Trading Compared

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

CS.MONEY and Tradeit.gg are both bot-based CS2 trading platforms where you get instant delivery and don’t have to coordinate with a human seller. Both hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg. But the way they charge you – and the way they let you cash out – couldn’t be more different.

CS.MONEY is the older platform (founded 2015) with the highest traffic in the CS2 trading category at ~7.1M monthly visits. It runs two modes: a trade mode where fees are hidden inside a bid-ask spread, and a market mode with published seller commissions. Tradeit.gg (founded 2017, ~2.9M visits) publishes its fees upfront – 8.5-13% depending on the item – but makes you jump through a two-step cashout process that takes 8-10 days.

Same destination, very different roads.

How the fee models work

This is the core difference, and it takes more than a glance to understand.

CS.MONEY operates in two modes. In trade mode, you swap skins against the platform’s bot inventory. There’s no stated commission – the fee is baked into the spread between what CS.MONEY pays for your item and what they sell it for. That spread typically runs 5-10% on standard items and compresses to around 3% on items over $1,000. You never see a “fee” line item; the price you’re offered is just lower than market value. In market mode (P2P listings), the fees are transparent: 5% on items under $1,000, 3% on items at $1,000 or above. Buyers pay 0% in both modes.

Tradeit.gg publishes a seller fee of 8.5-13%, varying by item type and price. What you see is what you get charged. There’s also an insta-sell option that pays about 83% of market value – higher than most competitors (Skinvault pays around 40%, Swap.gg around 80-85%). On the deposit side, crypto is free (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC), while card and PayPal deposits carry a 3.1% surcharge.

The practical math on a $100 CS2 skin:

Sell method CS.MONEY nets (est.) Tradeit.gg nets (est.)
Standard sale $90-95 (trade mode) or $95 (market mode) $87-92 (8.5-13%)
High-value ($1,200) ~$1,164 (3% market mode) $1,044-1,098 (8.5-13%)
Insta-sell N/A ~$83 (83% of market)
Visit Site Visit Site

CS.MONEY’s market mode (5%/3%) undercuts Tradeit.gg on every price point. The trade mode spread is less predictable but still typically beats Tradeit.gg’s published rates. The one area where Tradeit.gg wins is if you need instant liquidity without waiting for a buyer – the 83% insta-sell rate gets you paid immediately.

The cashout problem

Here’s where Tradeit.gg’s model gets complicated.

CS.MONEY lets you sell in market mode and withdraw directly via Visa. Trade mode is different – selling into trade mode gives you site balance that can only be used to buy other skins. You’d need to buy an item and then sell it in market mode to eventually reach a withdrawable state. But market mode itself has a cleaner path to cash.

Tradeit.gg uses a two-step balance system that trips up new users constantly. When you sell a skin, you get “trade balance” – site credit. Trade balance cannot be withdrawn. To convert it to cash, you buy items with your trade balance, then sell those items. Only the proceeds from that second sale become “revenue balance,” which is the only balance you can actually withdraw. On top of that, all revenue balance is locked for a 7-day protection window (fraud prevention, non-negotiable), followed by 1-2 days for bank transfer processing. Total time from first sale to cash in hand: 8-10 days minimum.

Cash deposits on Tradeit.gg can’t be refunded to your card either – you have to trade first. If you deposit $50 with your Visa and change your mind, that money has to go through the platform’s trade cycle before you can get it back.

Compare that to Skinport, where sellers get paid via SEPA in 1-3 business days, or DMarket with PayPal withdrawals. Tradeit.gg’s 8-10 day cycle is the slowest among major CS2 trading sites.

Delivery speed and trade experience

Both platforms deliver skins instantly via bots – no P2P waiting, no seller coordination. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish exact delivery times, but the experience is essentially immediate since you’re buying from the platform’s own inventory. Tradeit.gg advertises 8-10 seconds per trade, which matches what users report.

CS.MONEY’s standout feature is its 3D skin preview tool. You can inspect skins from every angle before buying – float values, wear patterns, sticker positions. It’s the kind of feature that makes browsing feel more like shopping than scrolling through a spreadsheet. The UI is polished and the inventory is deep, powered by that 7.1M monthly traffic.

Tradeit.gg’s interface is cleaner and more beginner-friendly. The trade flow is straightforward if you’re just buying – it’s the selling and cashout side that requires the learning curve. The insta-sell feature is useful for users who want to dump items quickly without listing them and waiting.

Neither platform has a mobile app. Both require desktop browsers.

Multi-game support

Game CS.MONEY Tradeit.gg
CS2 Yes Yes
Rust No Yes
TF2 No Yes
Visit Site Visit Site

CS.MONEY is CS2-only. Tradeit.gg supports CS2, Rust, and TF2. If you trade across titles – especially Rust, which has a growing skin economy – Tradeit.gg gives you one platform for everything. For CS2-only traders, this distinction doesn’t matter.

Traffic and liquidity

CS.MONEY’s ~7.1M monthly visits make it the highest-traffic CS2 trading platform, which means your items are seen by more potential buyers and sell faster. Tradeit.gg at ~2.9M visits has about 40% of CS.MONEY’s traffic but spreads it across three games. For CS2-specific liquidity, the gap is significant.

Tradeit.gg lists roughly 350,000 active skins. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish listing counts, but reviews describe it as “one of the largest inventories in CS2.” Both platforms benefit from the bot model – since the platform holds inventory, everything listed is actually available for immediate purchase. No ghost listings, no waiting for a seller to come online.

Trust and reputation

Both platforms hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg, but their reputation profiles look different.

CS.MONEY has a 4.6 Trustpilot rating across ~7,774 reviews. It’s been running since 2015 – the oldest major dedicated CS2 trading platform – and is operated by CS Virtual Trade Ltd. out of Limassol, Cyprus. The Trustpilot score looks solid, but the Reviews.io rating tells a different story: 3.4 out of 5 on 58 reviews. That gap suggests the Trustpilot audience may skew toward satisfied users. Common complaints include the non-transparent spread (users don’t realize how much they’re paying until after the trade), and the 2024 removal of the deposit bonus that was a key draw for many traders.

Tradeit.gg has a 4.7 Trustpilot rating across 20,574 reviews – the largest review count in the CS2 trading category. The operator is Tradeit.gg LLC, registered in Lewes, Delaware. However, the Reviews.io score is a stark 1.4 out of 5 on 18 reviews. Small sample, but an extreme gap. Common complaints are the 7-day withdrawal delay, the confusing two-step cashout system, and the 3.1% card/PayPal deposit fee.

Both are legitimate, long-running operators. CS.MONEY has more brand visibility through esports sponsorships (BLAST Premier presence, major CS2 events). Tradeit.gg sponsors Team Vitality – those long-term commitments signal financial stability.

Deposit options

Deposit method CS.MONEY Tradeit.gg
Credit/debit card Yes Yes (3.1% fee)
PayPal Info unavailable Yes (3.1% fee)
Crypto (0% fee) Info unavailable Yes (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC)
iDEAL / Bancontact No Yes
Visit Site Visit Site

Tradeit.gg’s 0% crypto deposit fee is a meaningful advantage. If you fund your account with USDT or BTC, you avoid the 3.1% surcharge entirely. For a $500 deposit, that’s $15.50 saved. CS.MONEY’s deposit methods are less clearly documented – the platform returned a 403 during our March 2026 research, so exact current options aren’t independently verified.

Who should use CS.MONEY

Use CS.MONEY if you:

  • Want the largest buyer pool in CS2 (7.1M monthly visits)
  • Value the 3D skin preview for inspecting items before buying
  • Plan to use market mode (5%/3% published fees are competitive)
  • Trade CS2 exclusively and don’t need multi-game support
  • Prefer a platform with 10+ years of operating history

Who should use Tradeit.gg

Use Tradeit.gg if you:

  • Trade Rust or TF2 in addition to CS2
  • Deposit with crypto and want to avoid all deposit fees
  • Need the insta-sell feature for quick liquidity (~83% of market value)
  • Want fully transparent, published fee rates (even if they’re higher)
  • Don’t mind the 8-10 day cashout cycle

The bottom line

CS.MONEY wins on traffic, skin preview tools, and market mode fees. If you’re a CS2-only trader who uses market mode, the 5%/3% commission is competitive – lower than Tradeit.gg’s 8.5-13% range. The trade mode spread is harder to evaluate, but most users report 5-10% on standard items.

Tradeit.gg wins on multi-game support, deposit flexibility (0% crypto), and fee transparency. You always know exactly what you’re paying. The 8-10 day cashout is the biggest drawback – if you need cash fast, this isn’t the platform. But if you’re a crypto user who trades across CS2, Rust, and TF2, the zero-fee deposits offset some of the higher seller commission.

Both score 85 on Trust Score. Both deliver instantly via bots. The choice comes down to whether you prioritize cost efficiency and speed (CS.MONEY market mode) or fee transparency and multi-game flexibility (Tradeit.gg). See all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score for the full picture.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Comparisons

Overgear vs Eldorado: WoW Boosting Compared

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

If you’re looking to buy a Mythic+ carry, a Heroic raid clear, or PvP rating in World of Warcraft, Overgear and Eldorado are two of the biggest names you’ll run into. Both have been operating for years, both handle WoW boosting, and both offer some form of buyer protection. But the platforms work in fundamentally different ways – and that affects pricing, seller quality, and what happens when something goes wrong.

Overgear is a curated marketplace where independent sellers compete for your order under escrow protection. Trust Score: 88. Eldorado is a high-traffic P2P marketplace with TradeShield escrow and a much larger seller pool. Trust Score: 76. One charges more for a more controlled experience. The other gives you cheaper options with more variance in quality.

How the platforms work

Understanding the model each platform runs is essential before comparing prices or features, because the model drives everything else.

Overgear operates as a marketplace with escrow. You browse offers from independent sellers (not an in-house team – a common misconception), pick one based on price, rating, and estimated completion time, and pay through Overgear’s escrow. The platform holds your money until you confirm the order is complete. If a seller fails to deliver, you open a dispute – it’s not an automatic refund, and resolution averages 4+ days. Sellers set their own prices and compete with each other, but Overgear’s commission structure (undisclosed) means seller pricing tends to run higher than on open P2P platforms.

Eldorado runs a pure P2P marketplace with TradeShield escrow. It’s structurally similar – sellers list, buyers choose, funds are held until delivery confirmation – but the scale is different. Eldorado pulls ~9.5M monthly visits across 20+ games, making it one of the top 5 gaming services marketplaces globally by traffic. That volume means a deeper seller pool and more price competition, but it also attracts a wider range of seller quality. Eldorado charges buyers an explicit 8% + $0.30 fee on every card or crypto transaction, while sellers pay 5% on currency orders and 10% on boosting/accounts/items.

The key distinction: Overgear’s marketplace is narrower and more curated, which tends to produce more consistent (but pricier) results. Eldorado’s marketplace is wider and more competitive, which produces lower prices but requires more buyer diligence.

WoW boosting services compared

Both platforms cover the full range of WoW boosting – Mythic+, raids, PvP, leveling, and profession boosts. Here’s how the experience differs for the most popular services.

Mythic+ carries

Mythic+ is the bread and butter of WoW boosting, and it’s where both platforms have the deepest seller pools.

On Overgear, Mythic+ carries are listed by individual sellers with ratings, completion counts, and estimated start times. The average wait time for a booster to begin your order is about 30 minutes. Prices tend to run higher – third-party reviews estimate Overgear’s pricing at roughly 35% above the competitor average for comparable services. Part of that premium goes to the escrow structure; part of it is just that Overgear’s seller pool skews toward experienced operators who charge accordingly.

Eldorado’s Mythic+ listings are cheaper on average because the seller pool is larger and more competitive. Currency delivery orders (which boosting technically falls under in Eldorado’s system) frequently start within minutes – the platform cites sub-one-minute delivery on currency, and boosting orders aren’t far behind for popular key ranges. The tradeoff is consistency: seller quality varies more, and you’re relying on individual seller ratings and TradeShield to protect you.

For a +15 Mythic+ carry (a common benchmark), expect to pay noticeably more on Overgear than on Eldorado – but also expect fewer cancellations and more standardized communication from the booster.

Raid carries

Heroic and Mythic raid carries follow the same pattern. Overgear sellers tend to be organized groups with completion histories visible on their profiles. Eldorado has more options at more price points, but the variance in group quality is wider. A Mythic raid carry is a high-stakes purchase – a bad group can waste hours of your time – so the platform’s vetting and dispute process matters more here than anywhere else.

Overgear’s escrow holds funds until you confirm completion, and sellers know that a disputed Mythic carry is bad for their profile rating. On Eldorado, TradeShield provides the same basic protection, but the dispute process depends more on your documentation. Keep screenshots. Confirm completion promptly. Don’t communicate off-platform – Eldorado’s TradeShield protection is voided if you move to Discord or WhatsApp.

PvP rating boosts

PvP boosting (arena rating, RBG rating) is the highest-risk category because it typically requires piloted access – the booster plays on your account. Both platforms handle piloted orders, though the approach differs.

Overgear mandates VPN use for all piloted orders, which helps mask the location change from Blizzard’s detection systems. The platform’s sellers generally follow this protocol because their ratings depend on it.

Eldorado’s sellers are more independent, and VPN compliance varies by individual booster. The platform itself doesn’t enforce a VPN policy the way Overgear does – it’s between you and your seller. For PvP specifically, where account security during piloting is the primary concern, Overgear’s more structured approach is an advantage.

Fees and pricing

Fee Overgear Eldorado
Buyer fee Included in listed price 8% + $0.30 per transaction
Seller fee (boosting) Undisclosed 10%
Seller fee (currency) Undisclosed 5%
PayPal Accepted Not available
Escrow Yes – funds held until buyer confirms Yes – TradeShield holds funds
Visit Site Visit Site

Overgear doesn’t publish its seller commission. What you see as a buyer is the all-in price – no separate buyer fee at checkout. This makes price comparison easier (what you see is what you pay), but it also means you can’t tell how much of the price is the seller’s rate versus the platform’s cut.

Eldorado’s fee structure is fully transparent but adds up. Buyers pay 8% + $0.30 on every card or crypto transaction. On a $50 boosting purchase, that’s $4.30 in buyer fees alone. Sellers pay 10% on boosting orders. Combined buyer + seller fees on a boosting transaction exceed 18%. For currency purchases, the math is a bit better: 8% buyer + 5% seller = ~13% total.

Despite those stacked fees, Eldorado’s final prices for the same services are frequently lower than Overgear’s. The deeper seller pool drives prices down enough to offset the fee structure. But it depends on the specific service and timing – during patch weeks and season resets, WoW boosting demand spikes and Eldorado’s prices can jump.

Traffic and seller pool

Metric Overgear Eldorado
Monthly visits ~1.1M ~9.5M
Trustpilot 4.9 / 5 (35,000+ reviews) 4.4 / 5 (143,000+ reviews)
Games supported 30+ 20+
Trust Score 88 76
Visit Site Visit Site

Eldorado’s ~9.5M monthly visits dwarf Overgear’s ~1.1M. That traffic translates directly to seller liquidity – more boosters competing for your order means faster start times and lower prices. For mainstream WoW services (Mythic+, Heroic raids, leveling), Eldorado has one of the deepest seller pools of any platform.

Overgear’s smaller scale means a tighter seller community. Repeat boosters build reputations that buyers can track over time. If you find a seller who consistently delivers clean Mythic+ carries, you can stick with them. That kind of relationship-based trading is harder on a platform with Eldorado’s volume.

A note on Overgear’s Trustpilot: 4.9 with 98% five-star reviews at 35,000+ scale is statistically unusual. Overgear holds a paid Trustpilot subscription that enables invited and incentivized reviews. That doesn’t mean the reviews are fake – but the distribution is atypical and worth noting. Eldorado’s 4.4 with 84% five-star and 11% one-star at 143,000+ reviews is a more natural distribution.

Dispute resolution and buyer protection

This is where the platforms diverge most in practice.

Overgear’s escrow holds your payment until you confirm the order is complete. If something goes wrong – booster goes offline, order isn’t finished, wrong service delivered – you open a dispute. Resolution takes 4+ days on average, and multiple reviewers describe outcomes that aren’t always in the buyer’s favor. The process works, but it’s not instant and not guaranteed. The upside: PayPal is accepted, which gives you an external dispute channel that most boosting platforms don’t offer.

Eldorado’s TradeShield works similarly – funds held until buyer confirmation, disputes opened for non-delivery. Eldorado also offers Account Warranty on eligible account purchases, extending protection beyond the standard window. The structural gap is that off-platform communication voids TradeShield entirely. If a seller asks to move to Discord and you agree, you lose all platform protection. Eldorado doesn’t offer PayPal, so there’s no external recourse if TradeShield doesn’t resolve in your favor.

For WoW boosting specifically, the most common dispute scenario is a booster who starts the order but doesn’t finish it (goes offline during a Mythic+ run, for example). Both platforms handle this through their escrow systems, but Overgear’s tighter seller community means this happens less frequently. On Eldorado, vetting your seller’s completion history and ratings before purchasing is essential.

Company and jurisdiction

Overgear is operated by OVERGEAR LIMITED, registered in Nicosia, Cyprus – an EU jurisdiction with consumer protection frameworks. Founded in 2017, the company has been running for over 8 years. Cyprus registration is standard for gaming services operators and provides a clear legal entity for dispute escalation.

Eldorado is operated by Eldorado Market, UAB, registered in Vilnius, Lithuania – also an EU jurisdiction. Founded in 2018. The Lithuanian UAB provides a stronger registration framework than offshore alternatives common in the category. Klarna acceptance (buy-now-pay-later) signals a European consumer-market orientation that’s unusual for gaming services platforms.

Both being EU-registered is a plus for buyers who want a legal entity they can hold accountable.

Who should use Overgear

Use Overgear if you:

  • Want escrow protection with a curated seller pool
  • Prefer consistent quality over the lowest possible price
  • Need PvP piloted services and want mandated VPN protection
  • Value PayPal as a payment option (and external dispute channel)
  • Don’t mind paying roughly 35% more for a more structured experience

Who should use Eldorado

Use Eldorado if you:

  • Want the lowest prices through competitive seller bidding
  • Need fast order starts (large seller pool means minimal wait times)
  • Buy frequently and want the widest selection of sellers to choose from
  • Are comfortable vetting individual sellers before purchasing
  • Accept the 8% + $0.30 buyer fee as the cost of marketplace access

The bottom line

Overgear is the controlled option. Smaller seller pool, higher prices, more consistent quality, PayPal accepted, VPN mandated on piloted orders. Trust Score: 88. You pay a premium, but you’re paying for structure.

Eldorado is the competitive option. Massive seller pool, lower prices, more variance in quality, no PayPal, stronger buyer fee transparency. Trust Score: 76. You save money, but you do more work vetting sellers.

For high-stakes WoW purchases (Mythic raid carries, PvP piloting), the extra cost on Overgear buys you a more predictable experience. For routine services (weekly Mythic+ runs, Heroic clears, leveling), Eldorado’s pricing advantage makes it the more practical choice. Browse all WoW boosting services on Tested.gg.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Comparisons

PoE 2 Currency: Prices Compared Across 6 Sites in 2026

29 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

Path of Exile 2 launched into early access and immediately spawned an active third-party currency market. Within days, every major currency platform had PoE 2 listings. Within weeks, price competition had stabilized enough to compare across sites. We tracked prices for Divine Orbs and key currency types across six platforms selling PoE currency during the first months of 2026.

The headline finding: prices vary by 20-40% across platforms for the same currency on the same league. The cheapest site isn’t always the same one – it shifts depending on league phase, stock availability, and how aggressively sellers compete on each platform.

PoE 2 currency basics for buyers

PoE 2 shares its currency framework with PoE 1 but introduces enough changes to create a distinct economy. Divine Orbs remain the high-value reference currency. Exalted Orbs, Chaos Orbs, and various crafting orbs round out the tradeable economy. New orb types specific to PoE 2 have entered the market but haven’t displaced Divines as the benchmark.

What you’re actually buying: Most third-party sites sell currency bundles – a set number of Divine Orbs or other orbs delivered to your character in-game. Prices are quoted per orb or per bundle.

Why PoE 2 is different from PoE 1 for RMT: Grinding Gear Games has taken a stricter stance on real-money trading in PoE 2 compared to PoE 1. The game includes a built-in Currency Exchange (similar to PoE 1’s official trade site) that facilitates player-to-player currency swaps within the game. GGG has explicitly stated that third-party currency selling violates their terms of service and that enforcement will be more aggressive in PoE 2. This means delivery risk – the chance of your account being flagged or banned after receiving purchased currency – is higher than in PoE 1 or most other ARPGs.

Price comparison: Divine Orbs across 6 sites

Prices below are snapshots from February-March 2026 on the standard softcore league. PoE 2 currency prices are volatile – early in a league, Divines can be 3-5x more expensive than late-league prices. These numbers reflect mid-league pricing.

Site Price per Divine Orb Trade Model Delivery Method Trust Score
G2G $0.40-0.80 P2P marketplace Direct trade 72
PlayerAuctions $0.50-0.90 P2P marketplace Direct trade 72
Eldorado $0.45-0.85 P2P marketplace Direct trade 76
MmoGah ~$0.36 (with volume discount) B2C direct seller Direct trade 88
IGGM $0.50-0.95 B2C direct seller Direct trade 83
LootBar N/A N/A N/A 90
Visit G2G Visit PlayerAuctions Visit Eldorado Visit IGGM

LootBar does not sell PoE 2 currency. LootBar specializes in automated mobile and PC game top-ups (Genshin Impact, Valorant, Clash of Clans) through official recharge channels. PoE 2 has no official top-up system, so LootBar’s delivery model doesn’t apply here. We include it because it appears in currency-related searches, but it’s not a PoE 2 option.

Note: PoE 2 is in early access. Prices shift significantly between league starts, mid-league, and end-of-league. The numbers above are mid-league snapshots and will not match prices at league launch.

Why prices vary this much

A 40% price gap between the cheapest and most expensive option on the same day for the same item seems extreme. Here’s why it happens:

P2P platforms (G2G, PlayerAuctions, Eldorado) have multiple sellers competing on price. The cheapest seller at any given moment sets the floor, but that seller may run out of stock quickly. The “average” buyer who doesn’t sort carefully or misses the cheapest listing pays mid-range prices. Price ranges in our table reflect the spread between the cheapest available listing and the typical listing.

B2C sellers (MmoGah, IGGM) set their own prices. MmoGah listed Divine Orbs at approximately $0.38 standard with a visible 5% volume discount bringing the per-orb price to ~$0.36 on larger orders. IGGM’s pricing was higher on average but included VIP discount tiers for repeat buyers (up to 5% off).

Hidden costs on P2P platforms: G2G adds an undisclosed order handling fee at checkout. Eldorado charges buyers 8% + $0.30 on card/crypto payments. PlayerAuctions charges 4.99% + $0.29 per order (2.99% + $0.29 for crypto). These buyer fees push the effective price above the listed per-orb rate.

After accounting for buyer fees, the actual cost gap between platforms narrows – but it doesn’t disappear. MmoGah and G2G’s cheapest sellers tend to be the lowest-cost options for most order sizes.

Delivery methods in PoE 2

PoE 2 currency delivery works through in-game player-to-player trading. There’s no auction house equivalent for currency – you trade directly with another player (or a seller’s delivery character) in a trade window.

How it works: After placing an order, the seller provides an in-game character name and location. You meet in-game, open a trade window, and the seller transfers the currency. For P2P platforms, the seller is a third-party individual. For B2C platforms, the seller is a staff member or contractor working for the site.

The Currency Exchange isn’t used for RMT delivery. PoE 2’s built-in Currency Exchange lets players swap currency types at market rates – but it’s designed for legitimate in-game trading, not for receiving purchased currency from external sites. Sellers don’t use the Currency Exchange because it would be trivially detectable by GGG.

Delivery time varies by platform:

  • B2C sellers (MmoGah, IGGM): Typically 5-30 minutes during business hours. May take longer during off-peak or immediately after league start when demand spikes.
  • P2P sellers (G2G, Eldorado, PlayerAuctions): Depends on the individual seller. Top-rated sellers deliver in 10-20 minutes. Lower-rated or part-time sellers may take hours.

GGG’s anti-RMT stance and what it means

This is the part that matters most if you’re considering buying PoE 2 currency: Grinding Gear Games enforces their anti-RMT policy more aggressively in PoE 2 than in PoE 1.

What GGG does: The company monitors trade patterns, flags accounts that receive large currency transfers from known seller accounts, and issues temporary or permanent bans. PoE 2’s trade system provides GGG with full visibility into every transaction – there’s no anonymous AH to hide behind.

The practical risk: Receiving a single purchase of 5-10 Divine Orbs from a seller who hasn’t been flagged is lower risk than receiving repeated large deliveries from accounts that GGG has already identified as sellers. But “lower risk” is not “no risk.” Any third-party currency purchase in PoE 2 is a terms of service violation, and GGG has the data to enforce it.

How PoE 2 compares to other games:

Game RMT Enforcement Level Delivery Risk
OSRS High – Jagex runs ban waves Moderate (established workarounds)
WoW (retail) Moderate – WoW Token absorbs demand Low for small amounts
WoW Classic Higher – smaller economy, no Token Moderate
PoE 2 High – GGG publicly strict, full trade visibility Higher than PoE 1

This isn’t meant to discourage anyone – it’s meant to set expectations. If you buy PoE 2 currency, you should understand that the risk profile is closer to OSRS than to WoW retail.

Site-by-site breakdown

G2G

G2G had PoE 2 listings within 48 hours of launch – unsurprising given it covers 2,000+ games. Seller count for PoE 2 currency ramped quickly, with 100+ active sellers within the first month. As a P2P marketplace, prices are set by individual sellers and fluctuate throughout the day.

G2G’s strength here is seller competition: enough sellers listing PoE 2 currency that the cheapest option is usually genuinely competitive. The G2G Guarantee escrow holds funds until delivery is confirmed. Seller commission ranges from 4.99% (Legendary rank) to 9.99% (new sellers), which influences how aggressively sellers can price.

Founded in 2015, Singapore-registered. 54,000+ Trustpilot reviews at 3.9/5.

PlayerAuctions

PlayerAuctions has been in operation since 1999 – the oldest gaming marketplace still running. PoE 2 listings appeared early, though seller count was lower than on G2G or Eldorado during the first month (roughly 40-60 active sellers).

PlayerGuardian escrow holds buyer funds during delivery. Buyer fee: 4.99% + $0.29 per order (2.99% + $0.29 for crypto). The seller level system (Level 1-5) helps filter for reliability – Level 4-5 sellers have thousands of completed transactions. US-incorporated (New Jersey).

Trustpilot: 4.2/5 from 16,800+ reviews. The 18% one-star rate is higher than most competitors, with account-related disputes (not currency) driving most complaints.

Eldorado

Eldorado had PoE 2 listings on day 2 post-launch. With ~9.5M monthly visits, it has the traffic to attract sellers quickly. Pricing was mid-range – not consistently the cheapest, but reliable stock availability and fast delivery from top sellers.

The 8% + $0.30 buyer fee on card/crypto payments is a meaningful cost add. On a $5 currency purchase, the fee adds $0.70 – pushing a $0.50/Divine listing to an effective $0.57. EU-registered (Lithuania) with published address.

Trustpilot: 4.4/5 from 143,000+ reviews. PayPal is not accepted.

MmoGah

MmoGah is a B2C direct seller – you buy from MmoGah, not from third parties. The company’s live site lists PoE among its supported games. Divine Orb pricing during our checks was approximately $0.38 standard, with a visible 5% volume discount bringing larger orders to ~$0.36 per orb.

No buyer fee. No marketplace sellers to vet. Delivery requires human coordination (a MmoGah staffer meets you in-game), so expect 5-30 minute delivery times rather than instant. 24/7 live chat support with named agents.

Founded in 2006 – 20 years of continuous operation. Hong Kong registered. Trustpilot: 4.9/5 from 6,300+ reviews.

IGGM

IGGM covers PoE on its live site alongside 50+ other games. B2C direct seller – IGGM is the seller in all transactions. Pricing was in the $0.50-0.95 range during our checks, which places it at the higher end but with VIP discounts (up to 5%) for repeat buyers.

IGGM’s differentiator is payment breadth: 20+ payment methods including PayPal, crypto, iDEAL, Sofort, and BLIK. If you need a specific regional payment option, IGGM likely supports it.

Founded in 2017. Hong Kong registered. Trustpilot: 4.8/5 from 165,700+ reviews.

The bottom line

PoE 2 currency is available on most major gaming marketplaces, but prices vary meaningfully. MmoGah (Trust Score: 88) offered the lowest per-orb pricing during our checks, with the added benefit of no buyer fee and a 20-year track record. G2G (Trust Score: 72) had the most seller competition and often matched MmoGah’s prices through its cheapest sellers. IGGM (Trust Score: 83) and Eldorado (Trust Score: 76) sat in the mid-range but offer strong payment flexibility and escrow protection respectively.

The higher enforcement risk in PoE 2 compared to other games is worth factoring in. GGG monitors trades with full visibility, and their public stance on RMT is stricter than most publishers in this space.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Comparisons

CS2 Trading Sites With the Lowest Fees in 2026

27 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

Seller fees on CS2 trading sites range from 0% to 15%. But the headline number rarely tells the full story. Deposit fees, withdrawal fees, and cashout method restrictions can quietly eat into what you actually pocket from a sale.

This ranking cuts through the marketing. We calculated the total real cost of selling a CS2 skin on each platform – seller commission plus withdrawal fees – and ranked them from cheapest to most expensive. Methodology: total percentage lost between listing a skin and receiving cash in your bank account or crypto wallet, based on published fee schedules and confirmed rates from site profiles.

The Fee Math

Before the rankings, here’s what a €100 and €1,000 sale actually nets you on each platform after all fees.

Platform Seller Fee Withdrawal Fee Net on €100 Net on €1,000 Total Cost
Skinflow 0% (listing) ~€0.10 (ETH/USDT) ~€99.90 ~€999.90 ~0.1%
CSFloat 2% 0.5-2.5% (tiered) ~€95.50-€97.50 ~€965-€975 2.5-4.5%
BUFF Market 2.5% 0% €97.50 €975 2.5%
DMarket ~2% Variable ~€97-€98 ~€975-€980 ~2-3%
BitSkins 5-10% 1-4% ~€86-€94 ~€860-€940 6-14%
Waxpeer 6% Low (crypto) ~€93.50 ~€935 ~6.5%
Skinport 8% (6% above €1,000) 0% (SEPA) €92 €940 (6%) 6-8%
Tradeit.gg 8.5-13% 2% ~€85-€89 ~€850-€890 10.5-15%
SkinBaron 15% (2% above €999) 0% (SEPA) €85 €980 (2%) 2-15%

Now the individual breakdowns.

1. Skinflow (Trust Score: 78) – ~0.1% Total Cost

Skinflow is the outlier. The marketplace listing path charges 0% seller fee – you list your skin, a buyer pays the platform fee (4-7%), and you keep the full sale price. Withdrawals via ETH, USDT, or LTC cost about $0.10. Prices are indexed to Buff163, so you’re getting market-rate or close to it.

The catch: Skinflow has ~580K monthly visits – far less traffic than CSFloat (10.4M) or Skinport (3.5M). Your items may take longer to sell, especially niche skins. The platform is Canadian-registered but doesn’t publish a physical address. And there’s a separate “instant sell” path at ~80% of market value, which is a completely different deal. Make sure you’re using the marketplace listing, not instant sell.

€100 sale: ~€99.90 | €1,000 sale: ~€999.90

Visit Skinflow

2. BUFF Market (Trust Score: 82) – 2.5% Total Cost

BUFF Market charges a 2.5% seller fee with 0% withdrawal fee – the simplest fee structure on this list. No tiered rates, no hidden cashout costs. What you see is what you get.

BUFF Market is the international arm of NetEase’s Buff.163, backed by a NASDAQ-listed parent company (~$20B market cap). The P2P trade model means items stay in your Steam inventory until the trade executes – no bot deposit required.

The downside: ~446K monthly visits, the lowest traffic of any major CS2 platform. Card deposits are inconsistently accepted for international users. No PayPal, no crypto payments. If you’re already comfortable with the platform, 2.5% all-in is hard to beat. Getting started can be the friction point.

€100 sale: €97.50 | €1,000 sale: €975

Visit BUFF Market

3. CSFloat (Trust Score: 96) – 2.5-4.5% Total Cost

CSFloat charges a flat 2% seller fee – the lowest published rate among major Western CS2 marketplaces. But the withdrawal fee is tiered by your cumulative lifetime sales volume: 2.5% under $2,500 lifetime, scaling down to 0.5% above $100,000 lifetime.

For most sellers, that means the effective total cost is ~4-4.5% (2% seller + 2-2.5% withdrawal). High-volume sellers eventually pay ~2.5% total, which matches BUFF Market but with 23x the traffic (10.4M monthly visits) and ~20M active listings.

CSFloat’s real advantage is the toolset: FloatDB indexes 1.6 billion skins, the AI Float Appraiser handles non-standard pricing, and the bargaining system lets buyers negotiate on items over $30. If you’re selling rare patterns or specific float values, no other platform comes close.

€100 sale: ~€95.50-€97.50 | €1,000 sale: ~€965-€975

Visit CSFloat

4. DMarket (Trust Score: 75) – ~2-3% Total Cost

DMarket advertises a ~2% seller fee for standard CS2 items – comparable to CSFloat. But there’s a catch: items below a price threshold can incur fees up to 10%. Non-CS2 games (Dota 2, TF2, Rust) are 5% flat.

Withdrawal fees vary by method – crypto covers blockchain fees, PayPal and bank transfers have standard processing costs. The total all-in cost for standard-value CS2 items lands around 2-3%, making DMarket competitive with CSFloat on fee structure.

What sets DMarket apart: instant bot delivery (no P2P waiting), multi-game support, and PayPal cashout – one of the few CS2 platforms that offers it. The risk factor is documented AML-triggered account locks, with resolution times of 3-10 months in reported cases. The 2.2M monthly visits are solid but well below CSFloat’s 10.4M.

€100 sale: ~€97-€98 | €1,000 sale: ~€975-€980

Visit DMarket

5. Waxpeer (Trust Score: 58) – ~6.5% Total Cost

Waxpeer charges a 6% seller fee with low crypto withdrawal costs. The all-in total is around 6.5%, which undercuts Skinport’s 8% but trails the top platforms by a wide margin.

The real issue isn’t fees – it’s reliability. Waxpeer has a 2.1/5 Trustpilot rating with documented trade failure rates and broken refund processes. The platform is registered in the Marshall Islands, a jurisdiction with no consumer protection framework. Crypto cashout is fast when trades complete, but “when” is doing heavy lifting in that sentence.

The public API makes Waxpeer popular with bot traders and arbitrage developers. For manual trading, the reliability problems outweigh the fee advantage over Skinport.

€100 sale: ~€93.50 | €1,000 sale: ~€935

Visit Waxpeer

6. Skinport (Trust Score: 97) – 6-8% Total Cost

Skinport charges an 8% seller fee on items under €1,000 and 6% above €1,000. Withdrawals are free via SEPA bank transfer – no withdrawal fee at all. That makes the total cost exactly 8% (or 6%) with no hidden additions.

Skinport is the most expensive platform on this list for standard items, but the tradeoff is clear: instant bot delivery, 0% buyer fee, a 4.8/5 Trustpilot from 35,000+ reviews, and German GmbH registration with EU consumer protection. The fee is the price of convenience and trust.

For sellers of high-value items above €1,000, the 6% rate starts competing with platforms like BitSkins and Waxpeer – with dramatically better reliability and legal protections.

€100 sale: €92 | €1,000 sale: €940 (6% rate)

Visit Skinport

7. BitSkins (Trust Score: 65) – 6-14% Total Cost

BitSkins has a volume-tiered seller fee of 5-10% – exact thresholds aren’t publicly documented. Withdrawal costs add more: Binance at 1%, bank transfers at 3% + $1.10, or Bitcoin at $25 + 4%.

For a high-volume seller paying the 5% tier and withdrawing via Binance (1%), the total is ~6% – competitive with Skinport. But a new seller at 10% withdrawing via Bitcoin could pay 14%+ total. The range is too wide to give a single number.

BitSkins has been operating since 2015 – the oldest CS2 marketplace still running – and supports Dota 2 alongside CS2. Traffic sits at ~492K monthly visits. The 7-day hold on new listings and lack of mandatory 2FA are the notable downsides.

€100 sale: ~€86-€94 | €1,000 sale: ~€860-€940

Visit BitSkins

8. Tradeit.gg (Trust Score: 85) – 10.5-15% Total Cost

Tradeit.gg charges an 8.5-13% seller fee plus a 2% withdrawal fee on bank and crypto cashouts. The total cost ranges from 10.5% to 15%, making it the most expensive platform on this list for sellers looking to cash out.

The complication: Tradeit.gg uses a two-step balance system. Selling items generates “trade balance” (site credit), not withdrawable cash. To actually cash out, you need to buy items with trade balance, sell those for “revenue balance,” and then withdraw. The 8-10 day total cycle time adds friction on top of the fees.

Where Tradeit.gg earns its 85 Trust Score is reliability. 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 20,574 reviews, instant 8-10 second bot delivery, and multi-game support (CS2, Rust, TF2). If you’re using it for skin-to-skin trading rather than cashing out, the withdrawal fee doesn’t apply and the effective cost is lower.

€100 sale: ~€85-€89 | €1,000 sale: ~€850-€890

Visit Tradeit.gg

9. SkinBaron (Trust Score: 89) – 2-15% Total Cost

SkinBaron has the widest fee range on this list. Standard items under €999 pay a 15% seller fee – identical to Steam Market, with no saving at all. Items €999 and above drop to 2%, which is the cheapest rate in the category for high-value items.

Withdrawals are free via SEPA. So the total cost is either 15% (standard) or 2% (high-value) with nothing in between.

This creates a niche: if you’re selling a Karambit Doppler at €1,200, SkinBaron’s 2% beats every other platform. If you’re selling a €50 AK skin, you’re paying Steam Market rates with extra steps. The 5% buyer fee on card payments (waived for SEPA balance) adds another wrinkle. German GmbH registration provides the same EU consumer protection as Skinport.

€100 sale: €85 | €1,200 sale: €1,176 (2% rate)

Visit SkinBaron

Which Platform Saves You the Most?

It depends entirely on what you’re selling and how much volume you move.

Selling standard items (€50-€500): BUFF Market (2.5%) and CSFloat (2-4.5%) are the clear winners. Skinflow’s 0% is cheaper on paper but lower liquidity may mean longer wait times.

Selling high-value items (€1,000+): SkinBaron’s 2% and CSFloat’s 2% + 0.5% withdrawal (for high-volume sellers) compete for the top spot. BUFF Market at 2.5% + 0% withdrawal is competitive here too.

Selling in volume: CSFloat’s tiered withdrawal rewards sustained selling – once you pass $100K lifetime, the effective total drops to ~2.5%. BUFF Market’s flat 2.5% requires no volume threshold.

Need instant delivery + cash out simplicity: Skinport’s 8% is the premium you pay for bot-instant delivery, 0% withdrawal, and zero friction. SkinBaron at 15% for standard items is only worth it with SEPA balance funding.

The days of 12-15% being standard on every platform are over. Competition has pushed the floor down to 2-2.5% for sellers willing to use P2P platforms. The question is whether the fee savings are worth the tradeoffs in delivery speed, liquidity, and platform trust.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Rankings

WoW TBC Classic 2026: Gold Demand, Prices, and Where to Buy

27 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

TBC Classic content arrived on WoW Anniversary servers in January 2026, and the gold economy lit up overnight. Epic Flying costs 5,000g. Cold Weather Flying is another 1,000g. Profession leveling through Outland tiers can run 500-2,000g depending on the craft. Raid consumables stack up weekly. And unlike retail WoW, there’s no WoW Token on Classic – every gold piece you don’t farm yourself comes from another player or a third-party seller.

We tracked WoW Classic gold prices across five sites during the first two months of TBC Classic on Anniversary servers. Here’s what the gold costs, where to buy it, and how delivery works.

How much gold you actually need

TBC Classic is one of the most gold-intensive Classic expansions. The headline number is Epic Flying – 5,000g for the training plus 200g for the mount. But that’s just the beginning.

Core flying costs:

Expense Gold Required
Regular Flying (training + mount) 268g 90s
Epic Flying (training + mount) 5,200g
Cold Weather Flying (WotLK content) 1,000g
Total flight training ~6,470g

That’s per character. If you’re leveling an alt, you’re paying it again.

Professions are the next major drain. Leveling a TBC profession from 300 to 375 through bought materials runs 300-2,000g depending on the craft. Jewelcrafting and Engineering are the most expensive (rare recipe materials, gem costs). Alchemy and Tailoring are cheaper but still require consistent gold for cooldown materials.

Raid consumables are a weekly cost that doesn’t end. A single Karazhan run for a DPS caster requires roughly:

  • 5x Super Mana Potions (~10g)
  • 5x Flask of Pure Death or Blinding Light (~50-80g per flask, or ~15-25g per Elixir combo)
  • 20x stat food (~5-10g)
  • Weapon oils or sharpening stones (~5g)

A full consumable set for one raid night runs 70-120g. Gruul’s Lair and Magtheridon add another raid night. By Tier 5 (SSC/TK), you’re consuming 200-350g per week just to raid. That’s 800-1,400g per month in consumables alone.

Crafted gear drives big one-time purchases. The Spellstrike set (Tailoring) costs 400-600g in materials. Blacksmithing weapons like Blazefury or Lionheart can hit 1,000g+. Leatherworking drums add a steady trickle of gold drain for the entire raid tier.

The total picture for a single character going from fresh 60 to raid-ready:

Category Estimated Cost
Flying (all tiers) 6,470g
One profession (300-375) 500-2,000g
Crafted pre-raid gear 400-1,000g
First month of consumables 800-1,400g
Total 8,170-10,870g

That’s a lot of gold in a Classic economy where farming 100-200g per hour is considered efficient.

Gold prices compared across 5 sites

We checked prices across five sites that sell WoW Classic gold during February-March 2026. All prices are for US Anniversary servers and reflect the cost per 10,000 gold at the time of writing. Prices fluctuate – these are mid-range snapshots, not guarantees.

Site Price per 10,000g (US) Delivery Methods Minimum Order Trust Score
G2G $2.50-4.00 Face-to-face, AH, mail Varies by seller 72
Eldorado $3.00-4.50 Face-to-face, AH $5 76
MmoGah $3.20-4.00 Face-to-face, AH, mail 10,000g 88
IGGM $3.00-4.50 Mail, AH 200,000g 83
LootBar N/A N/A N/A 90
Visit G2G Visit Eldorado Visit MmoGah Visit IGGM

LootBar does not sell MMO gold – it specializes in mobile and PC game top-ups (Genshin Impact, Valorant, Clash of Clans). We included it because it’s commonly searched alongside currency sites, but it’s not relevant for WoW Classic gold.

Price breakdown: At $3.00 per 10,000g, buying enough gold for Epic Flying (5,200g) costs about $1.56. The full raid-ready package (10,000g) runs roughly $3.00. Anniversary server gold is notably cheaper than Classic Era gold ($3.00-6.00 per 10K) because the larger Anniversary player base generates more supply and seller competition.

How the WoW Token affects pricing

The WoW Token exists on retail WoW but not on Classic servers. On retail, the Token sells for roughly 250,000-350,000g and costs $20 USD, establishing a real-money-to-gold exchange rate of approximately $0.57-0.80 per 10,000 gold.

Classic gold is roughly 4-6x more expensive per unit than retail gold. That’s because Classic economies have far less gold in circulation – no world quests, no mission tables, no Warband bank generating passive income. The supply is lower, so the price per unit is higher.

The Token doesn’t directly set Classic gold prices, but it creates a reference point. In practice, the completely separate economies mean Classic gold pricing is driven by server population, farming difficulty, and seller competition rather than Token dynamics.

Delivery methods: AH vs face-to-face vs mail

How your gold gets delivered matters for both speed and detection risk. Each method has tradeoffs.

Auction House (AH) delivery: The seller lists a junk item on the Auction House at the agreed gold price. You buy it. The gold transfers through Blizzard’s own trading system. This is the most discreet method because AH transactions are normal, expected game behavior. The downside: the AH takes a 5% cut, which the seller absorbs or passes on to you. Delivery is near-instant once the item is listed.

Face-to-face trade: You meet the seller’s character in-game and trade gold directly. Fast (5-15 minutes after order placement for most sites), but more visible – a level 1 character trading 5,000g to a player in Shattrath is exactly the kind of transaction Blizzard monitors. Reputable sellers use established characters and split large amounts across multiple trades.

Mail delivery: The seller mails gold to your character through the in-game postal system. Convenient because you don’t need to be online at the same time. The mail takes 1 hour to arrive for same-faction mail. Cross-faction isn’t possible in Classic. The downside: mail creates a clear audit trail.

Which to choose: AH delivery is generally the most recommended for large orders because it blends into normal game activity. Face-to-face is fastest for small amounts. Mail is the most convenient but least discreet. MmoGah offers all three methods and lets you choose at checkout – most sites default to face-to-face or AH.

Site-by-site breakdown

G2G

G2G is a P2P marketplace – you’re buying from individual sellers, not from G2G itself. This means prices are set by sellers and vary significantly. During our checks, Anniversary TBC gold on G2G ranged from $2.50 to $4.00 per 10,000g depending on the seller, server, and time of day.

G2G covers over 2,000 games – more than any other platform in this space. For WoW Classic specifically, seller count is high enough that competitive pricing is usually available. The G2G Guarantee holds buyer funds in escrow until you confirm delivery.

Seller fees are tiered by rank: new sellers pay 9.99% commission, dropping to 4.99% at Legendary rank. Buyer cost is the listed price plus an undisclosed order handling fee at checkout.

Trust Score: 72. Trustpilot: 3.9/5 from 54,000+ reviews.

Eldorado

Eldorado is also P2P with escrow (TradeShield). Prices ran $3.00-4.50 per 10,000g during our checks. Eldorado has ~9.5M monthly visits – higher traffic than G2G (~7.5M) – and its larger seller pool on mainstream titles tends to produce competitive pricing through seller competition.

The catch: Eldorado charges buyers 8% + $0.30 per transaction on card/crypto payments. On a $10 gold purchase, that adds $1.10. The seller also pays 5% commission on currency orders. Combined platform take is approximately 13% on currency transactions. Eldorado does not offer PayPal.

EU-registered (Lithuania) with a published Vilnius address – stronger jurisdiction than most competitors in this space.

Trust Score: 76. Trustpilot: 4.4/5 from 143,000+ reviews.

MmoGah

MmoGah is a B2C direct seller – you buy from MmoGah itself, not from third-party sellers. No marketplace. The company has been operating since 2006, making it one of the oldest continuously running gold sellers in the market.

MmoGah displays WoW pricing per 10,000g unit. During our checks, the rate for Anniversary TBC servers was approximately $3.20 per 10,000g on US servers. At that rate, buying 50,000g (enough for Epic Flying plus consumables) costs about $16. The full raid-ready package (100,000g) runs roughly $32 at the standard rate, with volume discounts available on larger orders.

MmoGah’s key advantage is delivery method choice: face-to-face, auction house, or mailbox. You pick at checkout. 24/7 live chat with named support agents. No buyer fee – pricing is built into the per-unit gold rate.

Trust Score: 88. Trustpilot: 4.9/5 from 6,300+ reviews. Reviews.io: 4.9/5 from 700+ reviews.

IGGM

IGGM is another B2C direct seller. Founded in 2017, it covers 50+ games on its live site including WoW, WoW Classic, OSRS, PoE, and various mobile titles. Gold prices during our checks were in the $3.00-4.50 per 10,000g range, with volume discounts kicking in at larger order sizes (5-8% off for 500,000g+ orders).

IGGM supports 20+ payment methods including PayPal, crypto (Bitcoin, ETH, USDT), and European regional options like iDEAL and Sofort. WoW delivery is via in-game mail or auction house – IGGM doesn’t offer face-to-face trades. Note that for AH delivery, you absorb the AH trading fee – IGGM doesn’t cover it.

A VIP membership program offers up to 5% discount, but it requires sustained order history to reach the max tier. New buyers won’t see the discount immediately.

Trust Score: 83. Trustpilot: 4.8/5 from 165,700+ reviews.

What about LootBar?

LootBar shows up in searches for game currency, but it doesn’t sell MMO gold. LootBar specializes in mobile and PC game top-ups – Genshin Impact Genesis Crystals, Valorant VP, Clash of Clans gems – at 15-35% below official store prices. Its UID-only delivery model (no account password required) works because these are publisher-supported recharge channels.

WoW gold doesn’t work that way. There’s no official top-up channel for gold, so LootBar’s automated delivery model doesn’t apply. If you’re looking for WoW Classic gold, stick to the four sites above.

The bottom line

TBC Classic on Anniversary servers is an expensive expansion. Between Epic Flying, professions, consumables, and crafted gear, a single character needs 8,000-11,000g to be fully raid-ready. At current gold prices ($2.50-4.50 per 10,000g), that’s roughly $2-5 in real money for the core costs – affordable by WoW gold standards, but consumables add up weekly.

MmoGah (Trust Score: 88) stands out for delivery method flexibility and an 18-year track record. G2G (Trust Score: 72) and Eldorado (Trust Score: 76) offer competitive P2P pricing with escrow protection. IGGM (Trust Score: 83) covers the broadest payment methods and offers volume discounts.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: Guides

New York Sues Valve Over CS2 Loot Boxes

27 Tháng 5, 2026 by ngocdang

On February 25, 2026, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Valve Corporation alleging that CS2 weapon cases violate New York State gambling laws. The suit targets the case-opening system across Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2 – arguing that the mechanic constitutes illegal gambling under both the New York State Constitution and Penal Law Section 225.

This is a state-level enforcement action, not a class action. If successful, it would affect how Valve operates in New York specifically. But the precedent it sets could ripple across the entire CS2 trading ecosystem.

What the filing alleges

The complaint centers on three claims:

  1. Cases are gambling – the AG argues that purchasing a key (consideration), opening a case with randomized outcomes (chance), and receiving an item with real monetary value (prize) meets the legal definition of gambling under New York law.
  2. Skins have real value – the filing points to the Steam Community Market, where skins trade for Steam wallet funds with the same purchasing power as cash. It also cites third-party marketplaces where skins sell for real money, arguing that Valve’s trade URL system and Steam Web API facilitate these cash-out pathways.
  3. Valve designed the system to mimic casino mechanics – the complaint specifically targets the spinning wheel animation, calling it a “near miss” illusion designed to trigger dopamine responses and encourage additional purchases. According to the filing, the outcome is determined the moment you click open – the animation is purely psychological.

The AG’s office also highlights harm to minors, noting that CS2 has no meaningful age verification for case purchases.

Valve’s historical defense

Valve has successfully defended against similar claims before. In McLeod v. Valve Corp. (2016), a Washington court sided with Valve, ruling that because their terms of service state skins have no real-world value and cannot be redeemed for cash, they don’t meet the legal definition of a “prize.” The same shield held in G.G. v. Valve (2021), where the court granted summary judgment because plaintiffs couldn’t prove they were deceived.

The core of Valve’s defense has always been: Steam wallet funds aren’t real money, skins can’t be officially cashed out, and Valve’s terms explicitly state items have no value. Whether that argument holds in 2026 – with a mature third-party trading ecosystem processing billions annually – is the central question.

What this means for CS2 trading platforms

The lawsuit itself doesn’t target third-party trading sites. But the downstream effects could be significant:

Short-term market volatility. Major legal actions against Valve historically cause price fluctuations on trading platforms. If traders anticipate restrictions on case openings, the supply of new skins entering the market could tighten – potentially pushing prices up on sites like Skinport, CSFloat, and DMarket.

API risk. The filing specifically calls out Valve’s Steam Web API and trade URL system as enablers of the secondary market. If Valve restricts API access to strengthen its legal position, third-party marketplaces would be directly affected. Trading sites rely on the API for inventory access, trade bot functionality, and price data.

Precedent for other states. If New York succeeds, other state AGs could follow. A patchwork of state-level restrictions on case openings would fragment the market and create uncertainty for platform operators and traders.

For now, nothing changes operationally. Valve will almost certainly file a motion to dismiss, and litigation of this scale takes years. But the filing signals that regulatory scrutiny of skin economies is escalating – and CS2 trading sites sit directly in the path.

What to watch

Valve’s response – likely a motion to dismiss – is expected within weeks. The key question is whether the court accepts that skins have “real value” despite Valve’s terms of service. If the motion fails, the case proceeds to discovery, which could surface internal Valve communications about case design and the third-party ecosystem.

We’ll cover developments as they happen. Update: Two weeks later, a federal class action was also filed – escalating the legal pressure significantly.

Chia sẻ

Filed Under: News

  • 1
  • 2
  • »

Latest Articles

CS2 Float Values Explained: Why They Affect What You Pay

CS2 Float Values Explained: Why They Affect What You Pay

Every CS2 skin has a float value – a number between 0.00 and 1.00 that determines its exact visual condition. This number is set permanently when the skin drops or gets unboxed. It never changes, no matter how many times the skin is traded.
Float value is the single biggest hidden factor in CS2 skin pricing. Two skins can share the same name, the same wear label, and look nearly identical in a marketplace thumbnail – but one costs $50 and the other costs $500. The difference is almost always float.
The 5 wear ranges
Every CS2 skin falls into one of five wear categories based on its float value:



Wear Category
Abbreviation
Float Range
What It Looks Like




Factory New
FN
0.00 – 0.07
Minimal to no visible scratches or wear


Minimal Wear
MW
0.07 – 0.15
Slight wear marks, often hard to spot in-game


Field-Tested
FT
0.15 – 0.38
Noticeable scratches, moderate paint removal


Well-Worn
WW
0.38 – 0.45
Heavy scratching, significant paint loss


Battle-Scarred
BS
0.45 – 1.00
Extensive damage, large areas of paint stripped



The category label is what you see on the Steam Community Market and most trading sites. But the label tells you the range – not where the skin actually sits within that range. A Field-Tested skin at 0.15 looks dramatically different from one at 0.37, even though both say “FT.”
Not every skin can exist at every float
This trips up a lot of buyers. Each skin in CS2 has a minimum and maximum possible float value defined by Valve. The AK-47 Redline, for example, has a minimum float of 0.10 and a maximum of 0.70 – it physically cannot be Factory New. The AWP Asiimov has a minimum float of 0.18, so it only exists as Field-Tested, Well-Worn, or Battle-Scarred.
Before you search for a Factory New version of any skin, check whether that skin can even roll below 0.07. If the minimum float is 0.06, the “Factory New” version you’re buying is already at the very top of the FN range and will have visible wear marks.
How float drives price
The relationship between float and price isn’t a smooth curve. It’s driven by two forces: visual quality and rarity at the extremes.
Within a wear category, lower float means higher price. A Factory New AWP Dragon Lore at 0.01 is worth considerably more than one at 0.06. Both carry the FN label. The 0.01 is visually flawless. The 0.06 has minor scratches visible under close inspection.
The category boundary creates a price cliff. A skin at 0.0699 (top of Factory New) and one at 0.0701 (bottom of Minimal Wear) can look almost identical. But the FN label commands a premium – sometimes 30-50% more – for that one data point difference. Buyers pay for the label, not the pixels.
Extreme low floats enter collector territory. Below 0.005, and especially below 0.001, skins become collectibles. A 0.0001 float skin is functionally unique. The lowest-float examples of popular skins sell for 5-10x the price of a “normal” Factory New. For high-demand items like AK-47 Fire Serpent or M4A1-S Hot Rod, sub-0.001 specimens can go for 20x or more.
Battle-Scarred extremes have their own market. On certain skins, a float above 0.95 creates a distinctive stripped look that collectors seek out. A 0.999 AWP Asiimov – nearly all base metal, almost no paint – is rarer and more expensive than a 0.45 Battle-Scarred one. The meme value is real, and it carries a real price tag.
Here’s how float typically affects pricing on a mid-range skin:



Float Value
Wear Label
Approximate Price Impact




0.001
Factory New
+200-500% over baseline FN


0.01
Factory New
+50-100%


0.03
Factory New
+10-20%


0.06
Factory New
Baseline FN price


0.08
Minimal Wear
15-25% below FN


0.15
Field-Tested
30-50% below FN


0.38
Well-Worn
50-65% below FN


0.90+
Battle-Scarred
Variable – collector premium possible



These percentages shift based on the skin. Knives and high-demand rifles (AK-47 Case Hardened, AWP Dragon Lore) have steeper float premiums. Sub-$10 skins see minimal float-based price differences.
Pattern index: the other variable
Float isn’t the only hidden number that affects price. Every skin also has a pattern index (sometimes called paint seed) – a value from 0 to 999 that determines the visual pattern distribution on the skin’s surface.
For most skins, pattern index doesn’t matter. But for a handful of high-value skins, it’s the primary price driver:

Case Hardened – the AK-47, Five-SeveN, and knife variants all have 1,000 possible patterns. Patterns with more blue (“Blue Gems”) sell for 10x to 100x more than average patterns at the same float. Pattern #661 on the AK-47 Case Hardened is the most famous example – a near-full blue top that regularly sells for tens of thousands of dollars.
Fade – knives and the Glock-18 Fade are valued by how far the color gradient extends. A “full fade” (pattern with maximum pink/purple coverage) is worth significantly more than a partial fade.
Marble Fade – “Fire and Ice” patterns (red and blue only, no yellow) command the highest premiums among Marble Fade knives.
Crimson Web – the number and centering of web patterns on Crimson Web knives directly affect value. A centered big web on a Karambit Crimson Web can double the price.

CSFloat displays pattern index data alongside float values on every listing – this is the go-to resource for checking pattern-sensitive skins.
Where to check float values on trading sites
Not every CS2 trading site gives you the same level of float data. Here’s what the major platforms offer:
CSFloat is built around float data. The platform started as FloatDB – a database indexing over 1.6 billion CS2 skins by float value, paint seed, and sticker combination. Every listing shows the precise float, and you can filter and sort by float range. The 3D inspect screenshots let you see exactly how the skin looks before buying. If float precision is your priority, CSFloat has the most comprehensive toolset.
Skinport displays float values on all listings with inspect links so you can verify in-game appearance. Sorting by float is available, though the filtering is less granular than CSFloat’s dedicated tools. For most buyers who want to check float before purchasing, Skinport covers the basics.
Tradeit.gg shows float values on listings. The bot-based model means you’re buying from platform inventory, so what you see is what you get – the float displayed is the float you’ll receive.
Steam Community Market technically has float data, but you need a third-party browser extension (like CSFloat’s Market Checker) to see it. Without the extension, you’re buying blind.
Practical float-buying tips

Set a float range before you start browsing. If you want a clean-looking skin but don’t need a collector piece, the 0.01-0.03 range for Factory New gives you an excellent appearance without the extreme float premium.
Check the skin’s possible float range first. If the minimum float is 0.06 for the skin you want, the FN version will always have some visible wear. A low-float Minimal Wear at 0.07 might actually look cleaner than a high-float Factory New at 0.069 on certain skins – and cost less.
Compare float-to-price across platforms. The same skin at the same float can be listed at different prices on Skinport vs CSFloat. Checking both before buying takes 30 seconds and can save meaningful money on items above $50.
Don’t overpay for float differences you can’t see. In-game, the visual difference between 0.01 and 0.02 float is often invisible – especially during gameplay. The price difference can be 30-50%. Unless you’re collecting, buy for the look you want, not the lowest possible number.
For expensive purchases, always use inspect screenshots. Float is a number, but what you care about is how the skin actually looks. Two skins at 0.03 float can look slightly different depending on where the wear maps onto the model. Platforms with 3D inspect tools let you verify before you buy.

Browse all CS2 trading sites to compare platforms with detailed float data and find skins at the float range you’re looking for.


Chia sẻ … Xem thêm
Top-Rated Gaming Sites in 2026, Ranked by Trust

Top-Rated Gaming Sites in 2026, Ranked by Trust

There are hundreds of sites where you can trade skins, buy game currency, get rank boosted, or earn free gift cards. Most of them want your money. Some of them deserve it.
Tested.gg tracks over 160 gaming service platforms across 8 categories. Every site gets a Trust Score from 0 to 100, recalculated daily from community reviews, security audits, traffic data, and operator transparency. The Verified badge means we’ve completed real-money purchase tests – not just read the marketing page.
This is the 2026 cross-category ranking. One top-rated site per category, with runners-up and the context you need to decide for yourself.
The Leaderboard



Category
Top-Rated Site
Trust Score





Trading
Skinport
97
Visit Site


Rewards
EarnLab
96
Visit Site


Accounts
Probemas
91
Visit Site


Boosting
Probemas
91
Visit Site


Currency
Probemas
91
Visit Site


Keys
LootBar
90
Visit Site


Betting
CSGOEmpire
84
Visit Site


Cases
CSGO-SKINS.COM
82
Visit Site



Probemas appears three times because it genuinely tops three categories. That’s unusual – most multi-category platforms sacrifice depth for breadth. Probemas doesn’t.
Now the individual breakdowns.
Trading: Skinport (Trust Score: 97)
Skinport has held the top trading spot since we started tracking. The numbers back it up: 4.8/5 Trustpilot from 35,000+ reviews, ~3.5M monthly visits, and roughly 3 million active listings across CS2, Dota 2, Rust, and TF2.
The seller fee is 8% on items under €1,000 (6% above). That’s not cheap – CSFloat charges 2% and BUFF Market charges 2.5%. But Skinport’s pitch isn’t low fees. It’s everything else: 0% buyer fee, instant bot delivery, free SEPA withdrawals in 1-3 business days, and a German GmbH with EU consumer protection. You pay more per transaction. You get a platform that just works.
Runner-up: CSFloat at Trust Score 96. If fees matter more than convenience, CSFloat’s 2% seller commission and FloatDB toolset make it the trader’s platform. 10.4M monthly visits give it the highest traffic in the category. The tiered withdrawal fee (0.5-2.5% based on lifetime volume) is the only wrinkle.
See all trading sites ranked by Trust Score.
Rewards: EarnLab (Trust Score: 96)
EarnLab launched in 2023 and climbed to the top of the rewards category faster than any platform we’ve tracked. Trust Score 96, Malta-registered operator, and payout rates that consistently beat the competition across offer walls, surveys, and video tasks.
What separates EarnLab from the crowded rewards space: transparent earning rates, multiple withdrawal options (PayPal, crypto, gift cards), and fast processing times. The interface is clean – no popup spam, no dark patterns pushing you toward low-value tasks. It does what a rewards platform should do and skips the noise.
Runners-up: CashInStyle at 92 (US-registered, strong payout rates), Freecash at 90 (largest user base in the category with 270K+ reviews), and Swagbucks at 90 (the veteran – operating since 2008 with Prodege LLC backing).
See all rewards sites ranked by Trust Score.
Accounts: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Probemas is a multi-category platform covering accounts, boosting, and currency across games including WoW, Valorant, League of Legends, and more. Its Trust Score of 91 puts it at the top of all three categories – a rare feat that reflects consistent quality across service types rather than specialization in one.
The operator is publicly registered with full contact information. User reviews highlight reliable delivery, responsive support, and competitive pricing. For account buying specifically, the verified status means we’ve completed real purchases and confirmed delivery integrity.
Runner-up: Chicks Gold at 82. Established multi-game marketplace with accounts, currency, and items. Broader game coverage but a more variable review profile.
See all account sites ranked by Trust Score.
Boosting: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Probemas tops boosting with the same score of 91. If you want a dedicated boosting-only service, the alternatives are worth knowing.
Boosting Factory at 88 is a specialized boosting operation – LoL, Valorant, WoW, TFT, and Wild Rift with 24/7 support and a self-play option. Overgear at 88 runs the marketplace model – you pick from multiple boosters competing on price and completion time. Both are strong platforms that compete on specialization where Probemas competes on breadth.
For WoW-specific boosting, Overgear’s marketplace depth is hard to beat. For LoL and Valorant, Boosting Factory’s dedicated teams have the edge. Probemas is the generalist that scores highest overall.
See all boosting sites ranked by Trust Score.
Currency: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Third category, same leader. Probemas at 91 covers in-game currency across multiple titles with consistent delivery and pricing.
But currency buying is game-specific, and the runners-up matter here. For WoW gold, Overgear (88) and MmoGah (88) are the established go-to platforms – Overgear with marketplace pricing, MmoGah with direct inventory and bulk discounts. LootBar at 90 doubles as a currency and key store, with competitive rates especially for mobile game top-ups. misti.services at 82 has been operating since 2013 – one of the longest track records in the category.
See all currency sites ranked by Trust Score.
Keys: LootBar (Trust Score: 90)
LootBar tops the key store category at 90. It’s a dual-purpose platform – game keys and in-game currency – which gives it broader appeal than pure key resellers. Competitive pricing and a clean purchase flow.
For authorized key stores specifically, Humble Bundle at 80 is unmatched. Every key comes directly from publishers – zero revocation risk, period. The tradeoff is less aggressive discounting compared to grey-market sellers. Instant Gaming at 80 offers deeper discounts with a French-registered operator and 7.1M monthly visits.
The key store category is split between authorized retailers (Humble, Green Man Gaming at 75, Fanatical at 75) and marketplace/reseller models (Kinguin at 62, G2A at 55). Trust Scores reflect that divide – authorized stores consistently score higher.
See all key stores ranked by Trust Score.
Betting: CSGOEmpire (Trust Score: 84)
CSGOEmpire leads the betting category at 84. The category overall scores lower than trading or rewards – the nature of skin gambling means fewer verified operators, less transparent house edges, and higher variance in user experiences.
CSGOEmpire has been operating since 2016 with a Curaçao gaming license. It offers coin flip, match betting, and roulette with CS2 skin deposits and withdrawals. The provably fair system is documented and verifiable.
The gap between CSGOEmpire and the next-highest betting site is significant. This is a category where Trust Scores cluster in the 40-65 range, and 84 stands well above the pack.
See all betting sites ranked by Trust Score.
Cases: CSGO-SKINS.COM (Trust Score: 82)
CSGO-SKINS.COM tops the case opening category at 82. Case sites are the highest-risk category on the platform – the house always has an edge, and long-term expected value is negative by design.
That said, CSGO-SKINS.COM has documented provably fair mechanics, instant skin delivery, and a consistent user base. SkinRave.GG at 72 is the runner-up with a Cyprus-registered operator.
We include case sites because users search for them and deserve honest Trust Score data rather than unranked affiliate pages. But the editorial position is clear: case opening is entertainment spending, not investment.
See all case opening sites ranked by Trust Score.
What the Numbers Tell You
Three patterns stand out across all categories:
Specialization correlates with trust. The highest-scoring sites in each category tend to do one or two things well rather than everything adequately. Skinport dominates trading. EarnLab dominates rewards. The exceptions – like Probemas across three categories – are rare.
Operator transparency predicts score. Every site above 85 has a publicly registered business entity, a real address, and responsive support. The sites clustering in the 40-65 range almost always have anonymous or offshore operators.
Category risk varies dramatically. Trading and rewards sites average Trust Scores in the 70-90 range. Betting and case sites average 45-65. That’s not bias – it reflects the structural differences in how these businesses operate and how users experience them.
Trust Scores update daily. If a site improves its security, earns more positive reviews, or gains traffic, its score rises. If it deteriorates, the score drops – and we’ve removed Verified status from sites that failed re-evaluation.
Browse the full directory of all gaming service sites ranked by Trust Score, or filter by game and category to find exactly what you need.


Chia sẻ … Xem thêm
Cheapest WoW Gold Sites in 2026

Cheapest WoW Gold Sites in 2026

WoW gold prices vary more than most buyers realize. The same 100,000 gold on the same server can cost anywhere from $5 to $9 depending on where you buy it – and that’s before factoring in delivery speed, delivery method, and the risk profile of the site you’re using.
With TBC Classic launching in January 2026 and The War Within driving steady retail demand, gold sites are competing harder than they have in years. We compared prices per 10,000 gold across 7 sites, checked delivery methods, and pulled Trust Scores to rank the cheapest options that are actually worth using.
Methodology: Ranked by price per 10,000 gold on US retail servers (WoW Midnight/The War Within). Prices checked in March 2026 and represent typical non-promotional rates. Delivery speed and Trust Score are secondary ranking factors where prices are comparable.
Price Comparison Table



Rank
Site
Price per 10K Gold (est.)
Delivery Method
Delivery Speed
Trust Score




1
G2G
~$0.55-$0.65
Face-to-face, AH, Mail
5-60 min
72


2
Eldorado
~$0.58-$0.68
Face-to-face, AH
1-30 min
76


3
MmoGah
~$0.60-$0.70
Face-to-face, AH, Mail
5-30 min
88


4
IGGM
~$0.62-$0.72
Mail, AH
5-60 min
83


5
Overgear
~$0.70-$0.85
Face-to-face
15-60 min
88


6
Chicks Gold
~$0.70-$0.90
Face-to-face
10-60 min
82


7
LootBar
N/A
N/A
N/A
90



Note: LootBar is included because it frequently appears in WoW gold searches, but it does not sell WoW gold. LootBar specializes in mobile and PC game top-ups (Genshin Impact, Valorant, Clash of Clans). If you’re looking for WoW gold, the other six sites on this list are your options.
1. G2G (Trust Score: 72) – ~$0.55-$0.65 per 10K Gold
G2G consistently offers the lowest WoW gold prices. As a P2P marketplace with 2,000+ game categories and ~7.5M monthly visits, the seller competition is fierce – and that drives prices down.
Gold delivery supports face-to-face trading, auction house, and in-game mail, depending on the seller. Delivery speed ranges from 5 minutes to an hour, with popular US servers generally landing on the faster end. The G2G Guarantee holds buyer funds in escrow until you confirm delivery.
The tradeoffs: G2G’s Trust Score of 72 is the lowest on this list. The 3.9/5 Trustpilot rating from 54,000+ reviews includes a 10% one-star rate. Seller quality varies – some are professional gold farms with instant delivery, others are individuals who may take hours to respond. The marketplace model means you’re dealing with the seller, not G2G, for fulfillment.
Seller fees are tiered by rank: 9.99% (Normal) down to 4.99% (Legendary). This affects how aggressively sellers price their gold. Buyer-side, G2G adds an undisclosed order handling fee at checkout.
Best for: Price-conscious buyers willing to vet seller ratings carefully.
Visit G2G
2. Eldorado (Trust Score: 76) – ~$0.58-$0.68 per 10K Gold
Eldorado is the second-cheapest option and arguably the fastest. With ~9.5M monthly visits, it has the highest traffic of any platform on this list. Currency delivery is frequently completed in under a minute – reviewers consistently cite speed as Eldorado’s strongest point.
The platform charges an 8% + $0.30 buyer fee on card and crypto payments. So a $10 gold purchase actually costs $11.10 at checkout. Factor that into any price comparison. The base gold rate may look competitive, but the buyer fee narrows the gap with sites like MmoGah that embed costs into their rates with no checkout-time additions.
Eldorado is EU-registered (Lithuania, UAB) with a published Vilnius address – stronger regulatory standing than Hong Kong or offshore alternatives. TradeShield escrow covers non-delivery. Klarna acceptance (buy-now-pay-later) is unusual in this category.
Delivery methods include face-to-face and auction house. Speed is the real selling point – multiple reviewers describe sub-60-second deliveries for popular servers.
Best for: Buyers who prioritize delivery speed and EU legal protections.
Visit Eldorado
3. MmoGah (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.60-$0.70 per 10K Gold
MmoGah has been selling WoW gold since 2006 – nearly 20 years of continuous operation. That track record shows in the review scores: 4.9/5 on Trustpilot from 6,300+ reviews and 4.9/5 on Reviews.io from 700+ reviews, both with 95%+ five-star rates.
Unlike G2G and Eldorado, MmoGah is a B2C direct seller. There’s no marketplace, no third-party sellers. MmoGah’s team fulfills every order. This removes the seller quality variance that’s inherent in marketplace models.
Pricing is mid-range – a few cents per 10K more than G2G or Eldorado. The premium buys you three WoW delivery methods (face-to-face, mailbox, auction house), named support agents available 24/7 via live chat, email, SMS, Skype, and Discord, and volume discounts starting around 5% at higher order amounts.
Delivery speed runs 5-30 minutes for WoW on popular servers. The auction house method is slower but reduces direct interaction with your character – a consideration for detection risk.
Best for: Buyers who want a proven, long-standing seller with flexible delivery methods.
Visit MmoGah
4. IGGM (Trust Score: 83) – ~$0.62-$0.72 per 10K Gold
IGGM is another B2C direct seller, operated by Hong Kong Game Bee Technology Co. since 2017. The standout number: 165,700+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5 with 94% five-star. That’s the highest review volume of any site on this list by a large margin.
WoW gold pricing sits slightly above MmoGah’s. The 200,000G minimum order is lower than some competitors, making IGGM accessible for smaller purchases. A VIP membership program offers up to 5% off for repeat buyers. Volume discounts kick in at 500,000G+ orders (5-8% off).
Delivery methods are mail and auction house – no face-to-face option. Buyer absorbs the AH trading fee on auction house deliveries. Delivery times range from 5-60 minutes, with delays documented for niche server currencies and event items (7-26 hour waits in some reports).
IGGM covers 50+ games beyond WoW, including OSRS, FFXIV, Path of Exile, and Diablo 4. Payment options are the broadest in this group: 20+ methods including PayPal, crypto, iDEAL, Sofort, BLIK, and GiroPay.
Best for: Buyers who want broad payment options and a high-volume, verified platform.
Visit IGGM
5. Overgear (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.70-$0.85 per 10K Gold
Overgear is primarily known as a boosting marketplace, but it also covers WoW gold through its independent seller pool. With ~1.1M monthly visits and 30+ games, it’s the largest boosting-first platform in the space.
Gold pricing runs noticeably higher than dedicated gold sellers – roughly 15-30% above G2G or MmoGah. Overgear’s own pricing has been rated ~35% above competitor average by independent reviewers. The premium reflects the marketplace model and Overgear’s positioning as a full-service platform (boosting, carries, and currency under one roof).
The upside: escrow protection on every order, PayPal acceptance (rare for boosting platforms), and a 7-year operational track record. The downside: the dispute process averages 4+ days, pricing is set by individual sellers with no fixed rate grid, and gold delivery is face-to-face only.
Best for: Buyers who are already using Overgear for boosting and want to add gold purchases without creating another account.
Visit Overgear
6. Chicks Gold (Trust Score: 82) – ~$0.70-$0.90 per 10K Gold
Chicks Gold operates a marketplace with escrow, covering 16 games including WoW, OSRS, LoL, and Valorant. Estonian registration (Tallinn) provides EU regulatory oversight – a meaningful trust signal in this category.
WoW gold pricing is on the higher end. Specific per-unit rates couldn’t be confirmed during research (Cloudflare challenge blocks automated access), but reviewer descriptions place Chicks Gold in the “competitive but not cheapest” bracket. The broader value proposition is multi-game coverage and US-friendly payment methods (Cashapp, Venmo, Zelle alongside PayPal and crypto).
Delivery is face-to-face. Support responsiveness is the documented weak point – response times of up to 3+ days have been reported, which is slow for time-sensitive gold deliveries.
Best for: US-based buyers who want multiple payment options and EU-registered buyer protection.
Visit Chicks Gold
TBC Classic Gold: A Different Market
With TBC Classic launching in January 2026, there’s a separate gold market forming around Classic servers. Classic gold prices are typically 2-5x higher per unit than retail WoW gold due to lower supply and different farming economics.
G2G, Eldorado, and MmoGah all support WoW Classic gold. IGGM covers WoW Classic as well. Pricing and availability fluctuate heavily in the weeks after a Classic expansion launch – expect premium rates and longer delivery times during the initial rush.
If you’re buying Classic gold specifically, check live prices on the day of purchase rather than relying on any comparison table. The market moves fast.
Which Site Should You Use?
On a budget: G2G and Eldorado consistently offer the lowest per-unit prices. G2G edges Eldorado on base price; Eldorado’s 8% + $0.30 buyer fee closes the gap but delivery speed is exceptional.
Want reliability over savings: MmoGah at Trust Score 88 with a nearly 20-year track record is the safest bet. You’ll pay a modest premium – a few dollars more on a typical order – but the B2C model eliminates seller variance.
Need payment flexibility: IGGM supports 20+ payment methods including regional European options. Chicks Gold adds US-specific options like Cashapp and Venmo.
Already boosting on Overgear: Adding gold to an existing Overgear order is convenient but expect to pay 15-30% more than dedicated gold sellers.
The price difference between the cheapest and most expensive option on this list is roughly $2-3 per 100,000 gold. For small orders, that’s negligible. For large purchases ahead of a raid tier or Classic launch, it adds up. Choose based on your priorities: price, speed, trust, or convenience.
Browse all WoW gold sites to compare the full directory.



Comments




Chia sẻ … Xem thêm
Skinport vs DMarket: Fees, Speed, and Trust Compared

Skinport vs DMarket: Fees, Speed, and Trust Compared

Skinport and DMarket both run bot-based instant delivery, both charge 0% buyer fees, and both handle CS2 skins. On paper, they look interchangeable. In practice, they serve different traders – and the differences show up the moment you try to sell something or cash out.
Skinport is the EU-regulated, SEPA-withdrawal, CS2-focused marketplace with a Trust Score of 97. DMarket is the multi-game, PayPal-and-crypto platform with a 2% seller fee and a Trust Score of 75. One charges more but gives you a cleaner path to your bank account. The other saves you money per trade but asks you to work a little harder on the back end.
Here’s where each one actually wins.
Seller fees
This is the single biggest difference, and it matters more the larger your inventory gets.
Skinport charges an 8% seller fee on items under €1,000, dropping to 6% on anything above that threshold. There’s also a 2% private sale rate, but that’s for direct trades between users, not the standard marketplace experience. Buyers pay nothing – listed price is checkout price, no hidden markups.
DMarket advertises seller fees “as low as 2%” for CS2 items, and that rate holds on standard-value skins. But there’s a catch: low-value items (below a price threshold DMarket doesn’t publicly specify) can incur fees up to 10%. For Dota 2, TF2, and Rust items, the rate is a flat 5%. Buyers also pay 0%.
The headline “2% vs 8%” is real for mid-to-high-value CS2 skins. On a $100 skin, a Skinport seller nets about $92. A DMarket seller nets about $98. That’s $6 per item – which adds up fast if you’re liquidating a whole inventory.
But the gap narrows on low-value items. If you’re listing a bunch of $2-5 skins, DMarket’s tiered fee structure can push your effective rate well above the advertised 2%. Skinport’s flat 8% is at least predictable.



Fee Type
Skinport
DMarket




Seller fee (standard)
8%
~2% (CS2)


Seller fee (high-value)
6% (>€1,000)
~2% (CS2)


Seller fee (low-value)
8%
Up to 10%


Seller fee (Dota 2/TF2/Rust)
N/A
5%


Buyer fee
0%
0%


Trade fee
N/A
~2.5%



Visit Site
Visit Site



Delivery and trade model
Both platforms use bot-based instant delivery, so neither requires you to wait around for a human seller to accept your trade. You buy a skin, the bot sends it, done. On Skinport, sellers deposit skins into the platform’s Steam bots upfront – the 7-day Valve trade hold has already passed by the time a buyer sees the listing. DMarket runs a similar model where listed items are immediately available.
The practical difference is minimal for buyers. You click buy, you get your skin. Neither platform requires a browser extension, and failed trades auto-refund on both.
Where the models start to diverge is on the seller side. Skinport sellers deposit items and wait for a buyer to purchase at the listed price – it’s straightforward consignment. DMarket also offers a trade function (distinct from buy/sell) with a separate ~2.5% fee, which lets you swap items directly without going through the cash cycle. If you’re the kind of trader who rotates through skins rather than cashing out, that trade feature saves a step.
Cashout and withdrawals
This is where Skinport’s simplicity becomes a double-edged sword.
Skinport offers exactly one withdrawal method: SEPA bank transfer. Zero withdrawal fee, 1-3 business days to arrive. If you have a European bank account, this is clean and cheap. If you don’t – if you’re in the US, Asia, or anywhere SEPA doesn’t reach – you’re stuck. No PayPal. No crypto withdrawal. No Visa cashout. SEPA or nothing.
DMarket gives you more options. PayPal, crypto, and bank transfers are all available, with fees varying by method (crypto charges blockchain fees, PayPal charges standard PayPal rates). For traders outside Europe, DMarket is dramatically more accessible. PayPal availability alone is a major differentiator – most CS2 marketplaces don’t offer it.
If you’re in the EU with a SEPA-compatible bank, Skinport’s zero-fee withdrawal is hard to beat. Everywhere else, DMarket wins on flexibility by a wide margin.
Traffic and liquidity



Metric
Skinport
DMarket




Monthly visits
~3.5M
~2.2M


Active listings
~3-3.5M
Not disclosed


Games supported
CS2 (some Dota 2, Rust, TF2)
CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2


Trustpilot rating
4.8-4.9 / 5 (35,000+ reviews)
4.0 / 5 (21,000+ reviews)



Visit Site
Visit Site



Skinport pulls ~3.5M monthly visits and lists roughly 3-3.5M items – making it the largest CS2 marketplace in Europe by listing count. That volume means your skins sell faster, especially in the popular $10-200 range.
DMarket’s ~2.2M visits are spread across four games. For CS2 specifically, the buyer pool is smaller than Skinport’s. But if you trade Dota 2, Rust, or TF2 items, DMarket is one of the few major Western marketplaces with meaningful depth in those titles. There’s no point listing your Dota 2 arcanas on Skinport – the audience isn’t there.
Trust Score and company structure
Skinport holds a Trust Score of 97, the highest among CS2 trading platforms on Tested.gg. The operator is Skinport GmbH, registered in Stuttgart, Germany (HRB 764879) – a real German limited liability company with EU consumer protection obligations. They’ve been operating since 2019, maintain a 4.8-4.9 Trustpilot rating across 35,000+ reviews, and have never had a major security incident. KYC is required for all seller withdrawals with no small-amount exemption.
DMarket’s Trust Score is 75. The operator is DMarket Inc., incorporated in Wilmington, Delaware, with an operational hub in Kyiv, Ukraine. Founded in 2017, the platform has processed over 107M cashouts. The Trustpilot rating sits at 4.0 with 21,000+ reviews – 71% five-star but 15% one-star, a notably higher negative rate than Skinport’s. The most common complaint in negative reviews involves AML-triggered account locks with reported resolution times of 3-10 months.
That TrustScore gap matters. Skinport’s German GmbH means EU regulatory oversight and a clear legal escalation path. DMarket’s Delaware incorporation is a US holding structure, but the operational team is Ukraine-based – which adds geopolitical considerations and can complicate support escalation for large disputes.
User sentiment
What Skinport users praise: instant delivery, 0% buyer fee, clean UI, EU compliance, consistent support, and active Trustpilot engagement.
What Skinport users complain about: KYC delays (the most common issue – can take days and blocks withdrawals during review), bot sniping of underpriced listings, SEPA-only cashout, and a 100-item listing cap.
What DMarket users praise: fast transactions, competitive pricing vs Steam Market, instant delivery, large multi-game inventory, PayPal availability, and wide payment selection.
What DMarket users complain about: AML-triggered account locks (the dominant negative theme – with funds frozen for months), poor communication during lockouts, payout rate changes after trade execution, and deposit processing failures.
The pattern is clear. Skinport’s complaints are mostly about limitations (KYC waits, SEPA only). DMarket’s complaints are more structural – accounts locked with funds inaccessible for extended periods is a fundamentally different kind of problem.
Who should use Skinport
Use Skinport if you:

Have a SEPA-compatible bank account
Trade primarily CS2 skins
Want the highest Trust Score in the category (97)
Buy more than you sell (0% buyer fee, and the 8% seller fee doesn’t affect purchases)
Prefer a predictable flat fee over variable rates
Value EU legal protections and regulatory oversight

Who should use DMarket
Use DMarket if you:

Need PayPal or crypto withdrawals (SEPA isn’t an option for you)
Trade across multiple games (CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2)
Sell regularly and want to keep the 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items
Use the trade feature to rotate skins without cashing out
Are comfortable with the platform’s AML review risk

The bottom line
For CS2 buyers in Europe, Skinport is the stronger platform. Zero buyer fees, instant delivery, a Trust Score of 97, and a straight line from sold item to your bank account via SEPA. The 8% seller fee is the premium you pay for that simplicity.
For sellers chasing lower fees, multi-game traders, or anyone outside the SEPA zone, DMarket makes more financial sense. The 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items is genuinely competitive, and PayPal/crypto withdrawals open the platform to a global audience that Skinport’s SEPA-only policy locks out.
Neither platform is universally better. The right choice depends on where your bank is, what games you trade, and whether you’re primarily buying or selling. For the full directory, see all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score on Tested.gg.


Chia sẻ … Xem thêm
CS.MONEY vs Tradeit.gg: CS2 Trading Compared

CS.MONEY vs Tradeit.gg: CS2 Trading Compared

CS.MONEY and Tradeit.gg are both bot-based CS2 trading platforms where you get instant delivery and don’t have to coordinate with a human seller. Both hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg. But the way they charge you – and the way they let you cash out – couldn’t be more different.
CS.MONEY is the older platform (founded 2015) with the highest traffic in the CS2 trading category at ~7.1M monthly visits. It runs two modes: a trade mode where fees are hidden inside a bid-ask spread, and a market mode with published seller commissions. Tradeit.gg (founded 2017, ~2.9M visits) publishes its fees upfront – 8.5-13% depending on the item – but makes you jump through a two-step cashout process that takes 8-10 days.
Same destination, very different roads.
How the fee models work
This is the core difference, and it takes more than a glance to understand.
CS.MONEY operates in two modes. In trade mode, you swap skins against the platform’s bot inventory. There’s no stated commission – the fee is baked into the spread between what CS.MONEY pays for your item and what they sell it for. That spread typically runs 5-10% on standard items and compresses to around 3% on items over $1,000. You never see a “fee” line item; the price you’re offered is just lower than market value. In market mode (P2P listings), the fees are transparent: 5% on items under $1,000, 3% on items at $1,000 or above. Buyers pay 0% in both modes.
Tradeit.gg publishes a seller fee of 8.5-13%, varying by item type and price. What you see is what you get charged. There’s also an insta-sell option that pays about 83% of market value – higher than most competitors (Skinvault pays around 40%, Swap.gg around 80-85%). On the deposit side, crypto is free (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC), while card and PayPal deposits carry a 3.1% surcharge.
The practical math on a $100 CS2 skin:



Sell method
CS.MONEY nets (est.)
Tradeit.gg nets (est.)




Standard sale
$90-95 (trade mode) or $95 (market mode)
$87-92 (8.5-13%)


High-value ($1,200)
~$1,164 (3% market mode)
$1,044-1,098 (8.5-13%)


Insta-sell
N/A
~$83 (83% of market)



Visit Site
Visit Site



CS.MONEY’s market mode (5%/3%) undercuts Tradeit.gg on every price point. The trade mode spread is less predictable but still typically beats Tradeit.gg’s published rates. The one area where Tradeit.gg wins is if you need instant liquidity without waiting for a buyer – the 83% insta-sell rate gets you paid immediately.
The cashout problem
Here’s where Tradeit.gg’s model gets complicated.
CS.MONEY lets you sell in market mode and withdraw directly via Visa. Trade mode is different – selling into trade mode gives you site balance that can only be used to buy other skins. You’d need to buy an item and then sell it in market mode to eventually reach a withdrawable state. But market mode itself has a cleaner path to cash.
Tradeit.gg uses a two-step balance system that trips up new users constantly. When you sell a skin, you get “trade balance” – site credit. Trade balance cannot be withdrawn. To convert it to cash, you buy items with your trade balance, then sell those items. Only the proceeds from that second sale become “revenue balance,” which is the only balance you can actually withdraw. On top of that, all revenue balance is locked for a 7-day protection window (fraud prevention, non-negotiable), followed by 1-2 days for bank transfer processing. Total time from first sale to cash in hand: 8-10 days minimum.
Cash deposits on Tradeit.gg can’t be refunded to your card either – you have to trade first. If you deposit $50 with your Visa and change your mind, that money has to go through the platform’s trade cycle before you can get it back.
Compare that to Skinport, where sellers get paid via SEPA in 1-3 business days, or DMarket with PayPal withdrawals. Tradeit.gg’s 8-10 day cycle is the slowest among major CS2 trading sites.
Delivery speed and trade experience
Both platforms deliver skins instantly via bots – no P2P waiting, no seller coordination. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish exact delivery times, but the experience is essentially immediate since you’re buying from the platform’s own inventory. Tradeit.gg advertises 8-10 seconds per trade, which matches what users report.
CS.MONEY’s standout feature is its 3D skin preview tool. You can inspect skins from every angle before buying – float values, wear patterns, sticker positions. It’s the kind of feature that makes browsing feel more like shopping than scrolling through a spreadsheet. The UI is polished and the inventory is deep, powered by that 7.1M monthly traffic.
Tradeit.gg’s interface is cleaner and more beginner-friendly. The trade flow is straightforward if you’re just buying – it’s the selling and cashout side that requires the learning curve. The insta-sell feature is useful for users who want to dump items quickly without listing them and waiting.
Neither platform has a mobile app. Both require desktop browsers.
Multi-game support



Game
CS.MONEY
Tradeit.gg




CS2
Yes
Yes


Rust
No
Yes


TF2
No
Yes



Visit Site
Visit Site



CS.MONEY is CS2-only. Tradeit.gg supports CS2, Rust, and TF2. If you trade across titles – especially Rust, which has a growing skin economy – Tradeit.gg gives you one platform for everything. For CS2-only traders, this distinction doesn’t matter.
Traffic and liquidity
CS.MONEY’s ~7.1M monthly visits make it the highest-traffic CS2 trading platform, which means your items are seen by more potential buyers and sell faster. Tradeit.gg at ~2.9M visits has about 40% of CS.MONEY’s traffic but spreads it across three games. For CS2-specific liquidity, the gap is significant.
Tradeit.gg lists roughly 350,000 active skins. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish listing counts, but reviews describe it as “one of the largest inventories in CS2.” Both platforms benefit from the bot model – since the platform holds inventory, everything listed is actually available for immediate purchase. No ghost listings, no waiting for a seller to come online.
Trust and reputation
Both platforms hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg, but their reputation profiles look different.
CS.MONEY has a 4.6 Trustpilot rating across ~7,774 reviews. It’s been running since 2015 – the oldest major dedicated CS2 trading platform – and is operated by CS Virtual Trade Ltd. out of Limassol, Cyprus. The Trustpilot score looks solid, but the Reviews.io rating tells a different story: 3.4 out of 5 on 58 reviews. That gap suggests the Trustpilot audience may skew toward satisfied users. Common complaints include the non-transparent spread (users don’t realize how much they’re paying until after the trade), and the 2024 removal of the deposit bonus that was a key draw for many traders.
Tradeit.gg has a 4.7 Trustpilot rating across 20,574 reviews – the largest review count in the CS2 trading category. The operator is Tradeit.gg LLC, registered in Lewes, Delaware. However, the Reviews.io score is a stark 1.4 out of 5 on 18 reviews. Small sample, but an extreme gap. Common complaints are the 7-day withdrawal delay, the confusing two-step cashout system, and the 3.1% card/PayPal deposit fee.
Both are legitimate, long-running operators. CS.MONEY has more brand visibility through esports sponsorships (BLAST Premier presence, major CS2 events). Tradeit.gg sponsors Team Vitality – those long-term commitments signal financial stability.
Deposit options



Deposit method
CS.MONEY
Tradeit.gg




Credit/debit card
Yes
Yes (3.1% fee)


PayPal
Info unavailable
Yes (3.1% fee)


Crypto (0% fee)
Info unavailable
Yes (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC)


iDEAL / Bancontact
No
Yes



Visit Site
Visit Site



Tradeit.gg’s 0% crypto deposit fee is a meaningful advantage. If you fund your account with USDT or BTC, you avoid the 3.1% surcharge entirely. For a $500 deposit, that’s $15.50 saved. CS.MONEY’s deposit methods are less clearly documented – the platform returned a 403 during our March 2026 research, so exact current options aren’t independently verified.
Who should use CS.MONEY
Use CS.MONEY if you:

Want the largest buyer pool in CS2 (7.1M monthly visits)
Value the 3D skin preview for inspecting items before buying
Plan to use market mode (5%/3% published fees are competitive)
Trade CS2 exclusively and don’t need multi-game support
Prefer a platform with 10+ years of operating history

Who should use Tradeit.gg
Use Tradeit.gg if you:

Trade Rust or TF2 in addition to CS2
Deposit with crypto and want to avoid all deposit fees
Need the insta-sell feature for quick liquidity (~83% of market value)
Want fully transparent, published fee rates (even if they’re higher)
Don’t mind the 8-10 day cashout cycle

The bottom line
CS.MONEY wins on traffic, skin preview tools, and market mode fees. If you’re a CS2-only trader who uses market mode, the 5%/3% commission is competitive – lower than Tradeit.gg’s 8.5-13% range. The trade mode spread is harder to evaluate, but most users report 5-10% on standard items.
Tradeit.gg wins on multi-game support, deposit flexibility (0% crypto), and fee transparency. You always know exactly what you’re paying. The 8-10 day cashout is the biggest drawback – if you need cash fast, this isn’t the platform. But if you’re a crypto user who trades across CS2, Rust, and TF2, the zero-fee deposits offset some of the higher seller commission.
Both score 85 on Trust Score. Both deliver instantly via bots. The choice comes down to whether you prioritize cost efficiency and speed (CS.MONEY market mode) or fee transparency and multi-game flexibility (Tradeit.gg). See all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score for the full picture.


Chia sẻ … Xem thêm

The Trusted Review Platform for Gaming Services

Helping gamers find legitimate services through real reviews and Trust Scores.

About
  • Browse
  • Game
  • Blog
Legal
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Report an Issue
Need Help?

We’re here to help you find trusted gaming services. Our community and Trust Scores guide you to the best platforms.

Contact us

Copyright © 2026 Tested.gg. All rights reserved.