News

New York Sues Valve Over CS2 Loot Boxes

27/05/2026

On February 25, 2026, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Valve Corporation alleging that CS2 weapon cases violate New York State gambling laws. The suit targets the case-opening system across Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team...

Valve Responds as Federal Class Action Joins CS2 Loot Box Fight

27/05/2026

Two weeks after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed suit alleging CS2 cases violate state gambling laws, a federal class action was filed against Valve on behalf of US consumers who purchased case keys in Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team...

CS2 Float Values Explained: Why They Affect What You Pay

Every CS2 skin has a float value – a number between 0.00 and 1.00 that determines its exact visual condition. This number is set permanently when the skin drops or gets unboxed. It never changes, no matter how many times the skin is traded.
Float value is the single biggest hidden factor in CS2 skin pricing. Two skins can share the same name, the same wear label, and look nearly identical in a marketplace thumbnail – but one costs $50 and the other costs $500. The difference is almost always float.
The 5 wear ranges
Every CS2 skin falls into one of five wear categories based on its float value:

Wear Category
Abbreviation
Float Range
What It Looks Like

Factory New
FN
0.00 – 0.07
Minimal to no visible scratches or wear

Minimal Wear
MW
0.07 – 0.15
Slight wear marks, often hard to spot in-game

Field-Tested
FT
0.15 – 0.38
Noticeable scratches, moderate paint removal

Well-Worn
WW
0.38 – 0.45
Heavy scratching, significant paint loss

Battle-Scarred
BS
0.45 – 1.00
Extensive damage, large areas of paint stripped

The category label is what you see on the Steam Community Market and most trading sites. But the label tells you the range – not where the skin actually sits within that range. A Field-Tested skin at 0.15 looks dramatically different from one at 0.37, even though both say “FT.”
Not every skin can exist at every float
This trips up a lot of buyers. Each skin in CS2 has a minimum and maximum possible float value defined by Valve. The AK-47 Redline, for example, has a minimum float of 0.10 and a maximum of 0.70 – it physically cannot be Factory New. The AWP Asiimov has a minimum float of 0.18, so it only exists as Field-Tested, Well-Worn, or Battle-Scarred.
Before you search for a Factory New version of any skin, check whether that skin can even roll below 0.07. If the minimum float is 0.06, the “Factory New” version you’re buying is already at the very top of the FN range and will have visible wear marks.
How float drives price
The relationship between float and price isn’t a smooth curve. It’s driven by two forces: visual quality and rarity at the extremes.
Within a wear category, lower float means higher price. A Factory New AWP Dragon Lore at 0.01 is worth considerably more than one at 0.06. Both carry the FN label. The 0.01 is visually flawless. The 0.06 has minor scratches visible under close inspection.
The category boundary creates a price cliff. A skin at 0.0699 (top of Factory New) and one at 0.0701 (bottom of Minimal Wear) can look almost identical. But the FN label commands a premium – sometimes 30-50% more – for that one data point difference. Buyers pay for the label, not the pixels.
Extreme low floats enter collector territory. Below 0.005, and especially below 0.001, skins become collectibles. A 0.0001 float skin is functionally unique. The lowest-float examples of popular skins sell for 5-10x the price of a “normal” Factory New. For high-demand items like AK-47 Fire Serpent or M4A1-S Hot Rod, sub-0.001 specimens can go for 20x or more.
Battle-Scarred extremes have their own market. On certain skins, a float above 0.95 creates a distinctive stripped look that collectors seek out. A 0.999 AWP Asiimov – nearly all base metal, almost no paint – is rarer and more expensive than a 0.45 Battle-Scarred one. The meme value is real, and it carries a real price tag.
Here’s how float typically affects pricing on a mid-range skin:

Float Value
Wear Label
Approximate Price Impact

0.001
Factory New
+200-500% over baseline FN

0.01
Factory New
+50-100%

0.03
Factory New
+10-20%

0.06
Factory New
Baseline FN price

0.08
Minimal Wear
15-25% below FN

0.15
Field-Tested
30-50% below FN

0.38
Well-Worn
50-65% below FN

0.90+
Battle-Scarred
Variable – collector premium possible

These percentages shift based on the skin. Knives and high-demand rifles (AK-47 Case Hardened, AWP Dragon Lore) have steeper float premiums. Sub-$10 skins see minimal float-based price differences.
Pattern index: the other variable
Float isn’t the only hidden number that affects price. Every skin also has a pattern index (sometimes called paint seed) – a value from 0 to 999 that determines the visual pattern distribution on the skin’s surface.
For most skins, pattern index doesn’t matter. But for a handful of high-value skins, it’s the primary price driver:

Case Hardened – the AK-47, Five-SeveN, and knife variants all have 1,000 possible patterns. Patterns with more blue (“Blue Gems”) sell for 10x to 100x more than average patterns at the same float. Pattern #661 on the AK-47 Case Hardened is the most famous example – a near-full blue top that regularly sells for tens of thousands of dollars.
Fade – knives and the Glock-18 Fade are valued by how far the color gradient extends. A “full fade” (pattern with maximum pink/purple coverage) is worth significantly more than a partial fade.
Marble Fade – “Fire and Ice” patterns (red and blue only, no yellow) command the highest premiums among Marble Fade knives.
Crimson Web – the number and centering of web patterns on Crimson Web knives directly affect value. A centered big web on a Karambit Crimson Web can double the price.

CSFloat displays pattern index data alongside float values on every listing – this is the go-to resource for checking pattern-sensitive skins.
Where to check float values on trading sites
Not every CS2 trading site gives you the same level of float data. Here’s what the major platforms offer:
CSFloat is built around float data. The platform started as FloatDB – a database indexing over 1.6 billion CS2 skins by float value, paint seed, and sticker combination. Every listing shows the precise float, and you can filter and sort by float range. The 3D inspect screenshots let you see exactly how the skin looks before buying. If float precision is your priority, CSFloat has the most comprehensive toolset.
Skinport displays float values on all listings with inspect links so you can verify in-game appearance. Sorting by float is available, though the filtering is less granular than CSFloat’s dedicated tools. For most buyers who want to check float before purchasing, Skinport covers the basics.
Tradeit.gg shows float values on listings. The bot-based model means you’re buying from platform inventory, so what you see is what you get – the float displayed is the float you’ll receive.
Steam Community Market technically has float data, but you need a third-party browser extension (like CSFloat’s Market Checker) to see it. Without the extension, you’re buying blind.
Practical float-buying tips

Set a float range before you start browsing. If you want a clean-looking skin but don’t need a collector piece, the 0.01-0.03 range for Factory New gives you an excellent appearance without the extreme float premium.
Check the skin’s possible float range first. If the minimum float is 0.06 for the skin you want, the FN version will always have some visible wear. A low-float Minimal Wear at 0.07 might actually look cleaner than a high-float Factory New at 0.069 on certain skins – and cost less.
Compare float-to-price across platforms. The same skin at the same float can be listed at different prices on Skinport vs CSFloat. Checking both before buying takes 30 seconds and can save meaningful money on items above $50.
Don’t overpay for float differences you can’t see. In-game, the visual difference between 0.01 and 0.02 float is often invisible – especially during gameplay. The price difference can be 30-50%. Unless you’re collecting, buy for the look you want, not the lowest possible number.
For expensive purchases, always use inspect screenshots. Float is a number, but what you care about is how the skin actually looks. Two skins at 0.03 float can look slightly different depending on where the wear maps onto the model. Platforms with 3D inspect tools let you verify before you buy.

Browse all CS2 trading sites to compare platforms with detailed float data and find skins at the float range you’re looking for.

Chia sẻ … Xem thêm

Top-Rated Gaming Sites in 2026, Ranked by Trust

There are hundreds of sites where you can trade skins, buy game currency, get rank boosted, or earn free gift cards. Most of them want your money. Some of them deserve it.
Tested.gg tracks over 160 gaming service platforms across 8 categories. Every site gets a Trust Score from 0 to 100, recalculated daily from community reviews, security audits, traffic data, and operator transparency. The Verified badge means we’ve completed real-money purchase tests – not just read the marketing page.
This is the 2026 cross-category ranking. One top-rated site per category, with runners-up and the context you need to decide for yourself.
The Leaderboard

Category
Top-Rated Site
Trust Score

Trading
Skinport
97
Visit Site

Rewards
EarnLab
96
Visit Site

Accounts
Probemas
91
Visit Site

Boosting
Probemas
91
Visit Site

Currency
Probemas
91
Visit Site

Keys
LootBar
90
Visit Site

Betting
CSGOEmpire
84
Visit Site

Cases
CSGO-SKINS.COM
82
Visit Site

Probemas appears three times because it genuinely tops three categories. That’s unusual – most multi-category platforms sacrifice depth for breadth. Probemas doesn’t.
Now the individual breakdowns.
Trading: Skinport (Trust Score: 97)
Skinport has held the top trading spot since we started tracking. The numbers back it up: 4.8/5 Trustpilot from 35,000+ reviews, ~3.5M monthly visits, and roughly 3 million active listings across CS2, Dota 2, Rust, and TF2.
The seller fee is 8% on items under €1,000 (6% above). That’s not cheap – CSFloat charges 2% and BUFF Market charges 2.5%. But Skinport’s pitch isn’t low fees. It’s everything else: 0% buyer fee, instant bot delivery, free SEPA withdrawals in 1-3 business days, and a German GmbH with EU consumer protection. You pay more per transaction. You get a platform that just works.
Runner-up: CSFloat at Trust Score 96. If fees matter more than convenience, CSFloat’s 2% seller commission and FloatDB toolset make it the trader’s platform. 10.4M monthly visits give it the highest traffic in the category. The tiered withdrawal fee (0.5-2.5% based on lifetime volume) is the only wrinkle.
See all trading sites ranked by Trust Score.
Rewards: EarnLab (Trust Score: 96)
EarnLab launched in 2023 and climbed to the top of the rewards category faster than any platform we’ve tracked. Trust Score 96, Malta-registered operator, and payout rates that consistently beat the competition across offer walls, surveys, and video tasks.
What separates EarnLab from the crowded rewards space: transparent earning rates, multiple withdrawal options (PayPal, crypto, gift cards), and fast processing times. The interface is clean – no popup spam, no dark patterns pushing you toward low-value tasks. It does what a rewards platform should do and skips the noise.
Runners-up: CashInStyle at 92 (US-registered, strong payout rates), Freecash at 90 (largest user base in the category with 270K+ reviews), and Swagbucks at 90 (the veteran – operating since 2008 with Prodege LLC backing).
See all rewards sites ranked by Trust Score.
Accounts: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Probemas is a multi-category platform covering accounts, boosting, and currency across games including WoW, Valorant, League of Legends, and more. Its Trust Score of 91 puts it at the top of all three categories – a rare feat that reflects consistent quality across service types rather than specialization in one.
The operator is publicly registered with full contact information. User reviews highlight reliable delivery, responsive support, and competitive pricing. For account buying specifically, the verified status means we’ve completed real purchases and confirmed delivery integrity.
Runner-up: Chicks Gold at 82. Established multi-game marketplace with accounts, currency, and items. Broader game coverage but a more variable review profile.
See all account sites ranked by Trust Score.
Boosting: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Probemas tops boosting with the same score of 91. If you want a dedicated boosting-only service, the alternatives are worth knowing.
Boosting Factory at 88 is a specialized boosting operation – LoL, Valorant, WoW, TFT, and Wild Rift with 24/7 support and a self-play option. Overgear at 88 runs the marketplace model – you pick from multiple boosters competing on price and completion time. Both are strong platforms that compete on specialization where Probemas competes on breadth.
For WoW-specific boosting, Overgear’s marketplace depth is hard to beat. For LoL and Valorant, Boosting Factory’s dedicated teams have the edge. Probemas is the generalist that scores highest overall.
See all boosting sites ranked by Trust Score.
Currency: Probemas (Trust Score: 91)
Third category, same leader. Probemas at 91 covers in-game currency across multiple titles with consistent delivery and pricing.
But currency buying is game-specific, and the runners-up matter here. For WoW gold, Overgear (88) and MmoGah (88) are the established go-to platforms – Overgear with marketplace pricing, MmoGah with direct inventory and bulk discounts. LootBar at 90 doubles as a currency and key store, with competitive rates especially for mobile game top-ups. misti.services at 82 has been operating since 2013 – one of the longest track records in the category.
See all currency sites ranked by Trust Score.
Keys: LootBar (Trust Score: 90)
LootBar tops the key store category at 90. It’s a dual-purpose platform – game keys and in-game currency – which gives it broader appeal than pure key resellers. Competitive pricing and a clean purchase flow.
For authorized key stores specifically, Humble Bundle at 80 is unmatched. Every key comes directly from publishers – zero revocation risk, period. The tradeoff is less aggressive discounting compared to grey-market sellers. Instant Gaming at 80 offers deeper discounts with a French-registered operator and 7.1M monthly visits.
The key store category is split between authorized retailers (Humble, Green Man Gaming at 75, Fanatical at 75) and marketplace/reseller models (Kinguin at 62, G2A at 55). Trust Scores reflect that divide – authorized stores consistently score higher.
See all key stores ranked by Trust Score.
Betting: CSGOEmpire (Trust Score: 84)
CSGOEmpire leads the betting category at 84. The category overall scores lower than trading or rewards – the nature of skin gambling means fewer verified operators, less transparent house edges, and higher variance in user experiences.
CSGOEmpire has been operating since 2016 with a Curaçao gaming license. It offers coin flip, match betting, and roulette with CS2 skin deposits and withdrawals. The provably fair system is documented and verifiable.
The gap between CSGOEmpire and the next-highest betting site is significant. This is a category where Trust Scores cluster in the 40-65 range, and 84 stands well above the pack.
See all betting sites ranked by Trust Score.
Cases: CSGO-SKINS.COM (Trust Score: 82)
CSGO-SKINS.COM tops the case opening category at 82. Case sites are the highest-risk category on the platform – the house always has an edge, and long-term expected value is negative by design.
That said, CSGO-SKINS.COM has documented provably fair mechanics, instant skin delivery, and a consistent user base. SkinRave.GG at 72 is the runner-up with a Cyprus-registered operator.
We include case sites because users search for them and deserve honest Trust Score data rather than unranked affiliate pages. But the editorial position is clear: case opening is entertainment spending, not investment.
See all case opening sites ranked by Trust Score.
What the Numbers Tell You
Three patterns stand out across all categories:
Specialization correlates with trust. The highest-scoring sites in each category tend to do one or two things well rather than everything adequately. Skinport dominates trading. EarnLab dominates rewards. The exceptions – like Probemas across three categories – are rare.
Operator transparency predicts score. Every site above 85 has a publicly registered business entity, a real address, and responsive support. The sites clustering in the 40-65 range almost always have anonymous or offshore operators.
Category risk varies dramatically. Trading and rewards sites average Trust Scores in the 70-90 range. Betting and case sites average 45-65. That’s not bias – it reflects the structural differences in how these businesses operate and how users experience them.
Trust Scores update daily. If a site improves its security, earns more positive reviews, or gains traffic, its score rises. If it deteriorates, the score drops – and we’ve removed Verified status from sites that failed re-evaluation.
Browse the full directory of all gaming service sites ranked by Trust Score, or filter by game and category to find exactly what you need.

Chia sẻ … Xem thêm

Cheapest WoW Gold Sites in 2026

WoW gold prices vary more than most buyers realize. The same 100,000 gold on the same server can cost anywhere from $5 to $9 depending on where you buy it – and that’s before factoring in delivery speed, delivery method, and the risk profile of the site you’re using.
With TBC Classic launching in January 2026 and The War Within driving steady retail demand, gold sites are competing harder than they have in years. We compared prices per 10,000 gold across 7 sites, checked delivery methods, and pulled Trust Scores to rank the cheapest options that are actually worth using.
Methodology: Ranked by price per 10,000 gold on US retail servers (WoW Midnight/The War Within). Prices checked in March 2026 and represent typical non-promotional rates. Delivery speed and Trust Score are secondary ranking factors where prices are comparable.
Price Comparison Table

Rank
Site
Price per 10K Gold (est.)
Delivery Method
Delivery Speed
Trust Score

1
G2G
~$0.55-$0.65
Face-to-face, AH, Mail
5-60 min
72

2
Eldorado
~$0.58-$0.68
Face-to-face, AH
1-30 min
76

3
MmoGah
~$0.60-$0.70
Face-to-face, AH, Mail
5-30 min
88

4
IGGM
~$0.62-$0.72
Mail, AH
5-60 min
83

5
Overgear
~$0.70-$0.85
Face-to-face
15-60 min
88

6
Chicks Gold
~$0.70-$0.90
Face-to-face
10-60 min
82

7
LootBar
N/A
N/A
N/A
90

Note: LootBar is included because it frequently appears in WoW gold searches, but it does not sell WoW gold. LootBar specializes in mobile and PC game top-ups (Genshin Impact, Valorant, Clash of Clans). If you’re looking for WoW gold, the other six sites on this list are your options.
1. G2G (Trust Score: 72) – ~$0.55-$0.65 per 10K Gold
G2G consistently offers the lowest WoW gold prices. As a P2P marketplace with 2,000+ game categories and ~7.5M monthly visits, the seller competition is fierce – and that drives prices down.
Gold delivery supports face-to-face trading, auction house, and in-game mail, depending on the seller. Delivery speed ranges from 5 minutes to an hour, with popular US servers generally landing on the faster end. The G2G Guarantee holds buyer funds in escrow until you confirm delivery.
The tradeoffs: G2G’s Trust Score of 72 is the lowest on this list. The 3.9/5 Trustpilot rating from 54,000+ reviews includes a 10% one-star rate. Seller quality varies – some are professional gold farms with instant delivery, others are individuals who may take hours to respond. The marketplace model means you’re dealing with the seller, not G2G, for fulfillment.
Seller fees are tiered by rank: 9.99% (Normal) down to 4.99% (Legendary). This affects how aggressively sellers price their gold. Buyer-side, G2G adds an undisclosed order handling fee at checkout.
Best for: Price-conscious buyers willing to vet seller ratings carefully.
Visit G2G
2. Eldorado (Trust Score: 76) – ~$0.58-$0.68 per 10K Gold
Eldorado is the second-cheapest option and arguably the fastest. With ~9.5M monthly visits, it has the highest traffic of any platform on this list. Currency delivery is frequently completed in under a minute – reviewers consistently cite speed as Eldorado’s strongest point.
The platform charges an 8% + $0.30 buyer fee on card and crypto payments. So a $10 gold purchase actually costs $11.10 at checkout. Factor that into any price comparison. The base gold rate may look competitive, but the buyer fee narrows the gap with sites like MmoGah that embed costs into their rates with no checkout-time additions.
Eldorado is EU-registered (Lithuania, UAB) with a published Vilnius address – stronger regulatory standing than Hong Kong or offshore alternatives. TradeShield escrow covers non-delivery. Klarna acceptance (buy-now-pay-later) is unusual in this category.
Delivery methods include face-to-face and auction house. Speed is the real selling point – multiple reviewers describe sub-60-second deliveries for popular servers.
Best for: Buyers who prioritize delivery speed and EU legal protections.
Visit Eldorado
3. MmoGah (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.60-$0.70 per 10K Gold
MmoGah has been selling WoW gold since 2006 – nearly 20 years of continuous operation. That track record shows in the review scores: 4.9/5 on Trustpilot from 6,300+ reviews and 4.9/5 on Reviews.io from 700+ reviews, both with 95%+ five-star rates.
Unlike G2G and Eldorado, MmoGah is a B2C direct seller. There’s no marketplace, no third-party sellers. MmoGah’s team fulfills every order. This removes the seller quality variance that’s inherent in marketplace models.
Pricing is mid-range – a few cents per 10K more than G2G or Eldorado. The premium buys you three WoW delivery methods (face-to-face, mailbox, auction house), named support agents available 24/7 via live chat, email, SMS, Skype, and Discord, and volume discounts starting around 5% at higher order amounts.
Delivery speed runs 5-30 minutes for WoW on popular servers. The auction house method is slower but reduces direct interaction with your character – a consideration for detection risk.
Best for: Buyers who want a proven, long-standing seller with flexible delivery methods.
Visit MmoGah
4. IGGM (Trust Score: 83) – ~$0.62-$0.72 per 10K Gold
IGGM is another B2C direct seller, operated by Hong Kong Game Bee Technology Co. since 2017. The standout number: 165,700+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.8/5 with 94% five-star. That’s the highest review volume of any site on this list by a large margin.
WoW gold pricing sits slightly above MmoGah’s. The 200,000G minimum order is lower than some competitors, making IGGM accessible for smaller purchases. A VIP membership program offers up to 5% off for repeat buyers. Volume discounts kick in at 500,000G+ orders (5-8% off).
Delivery methods are mail and auction house – no face-to-face option. Buyer absorbs the AH trading fee on auction house deliveries. Delivery times range from 5-60 minutes, with delays documented for niche server currencies and event items (7-26 hour waits in some reports).
IGGM covers 50+ games beyond WoW, including OSRS, FFXIV, Path of Exile, and Diablo 4. Payment options are the broadest in this group: 20+ methods including PayPal, crypto, iDEAL, Sofort, BLIK, and GiroPay.
Best for: Buyers who want broad payment options and a high-volume, verified platform.
Visit IGGM
5. Overgear (Trust Score: 88) – ~$0.70-$0.85 per 10K Gold
Overgear is primarily known as a boosting marketplace, but it also covers WoW gold through its independent seller pool. With ~1.1M monthly visits and 30+ games, it’s the largest boosting-first platform in the space.
Gold pricing runs noticeably higher than dedicated gold sellers – roughly 15-30% above G2G or MmoGah. Overgear’s own pricing has been rated ~35% above competitor average by independent reviewers. The premium reflects the marketplace model and Overgear’s positioning as a full-service platform (boosting, carries, and currency under one roof).
The upside: escrow protection on every order, PayPal acceptance (rare for boosting platforms), and a 7-year operational track record. The downside: the dispute process averages 4+ days, pricing is set by individual sellers with no fixed rate grid, and gold delivery is face-to-face only.
Best for: Buyers who are already using Overgear for boosting and want to add gold purchases without creating another account.
Visit Overgear
6. Chicks Gold (Trust Score: 82) – ~$0.70-$0.90 per 10K Gold
Chicks Gold operates a marketplace with escrow, covering 16 games including WoW, OSRS, LoL, and Valorant. Estonian registration (Tallinn) provides EU regulatory oversight – a meaningful trust signal in this category.
WoW gold pricing is on the higher end. Specific per-unit rates couldn’t be confirmed during research (Cloudflare challenge blocks automated access), but reviewer descriptions place Chicks Gold in the “competitive but not cheapest” bracket. The broader value proposition is multi-game coverage and US-friendly payment methods (Cashapp, Venmo, Zelle alongside PayPal and crypto).
Delivery is face-to-face. Support responsiveness is the documented weak point – response times of up to 3+ days have been reported, which is slow for time-sensitive gold deliveries.
Best for: US-based buyers who want multiple payment options and EU-registered buyer protection.
Visit Chicks Gold
TBC Classic Gold: A Different Market
With TBC Classic launching in January 2026, there’s a separate gold market forming around Classic servers. Classic gold prices are typically 2-5x higher per unit than retail WoW gold due to lower supply and different farming economics.
G2G, Eldorado, and MmoGah all support WoW Classic gold. IGGM covers WoW Classic as well. Pricing and availability fluctuate heavily in the weeks after a Classic expansion launch – expect premium rates and longer delivery times during the initial rush.
If you’re buying Classic gold specifically, check live prices on the day of purchase rather than relying on any comparison table. The market moves fast.
Which Site Should You Use?
On a budget: G2G and Eldorado consistently offer the lowest per-unit prices. G2G edges Eldorado on base price; Eldorado’s 8% + $0.30 buyer fee closes the gap but delivery speed is exceptional.
Want reliability over savings: MmoGah at Trust Score 88 with a nearly 20-year track record is the safest bet. You’ll pay a modest premium – a few dollars more on a typical order – but the B2C model eliminates seller variance.
Need payment flexibility: IGGM supports 20+ payment methods including regional European options. Chicks Gold adds US-specific options like Cashapp and Venmo.
Already boosting on Overgear: Adding gold to an existing Overgear order is convenient but expect to pay 15-30% more than dedicated gold sellers.
The price difference between the cheapest and most expensive option on this list is roughly $2-3 per 100,000 gold. For small orders, that’s negligible. For large purchases ahead of a raid tier or Classic launch, it adds up. Choose based on your priorities: price, speed, trust, or convenience.
Browse all WoW gold sites to compare the full directory.

Comments

Chia sẻ … Xem thêm

Skinport vs DMarket: Fees, Speed, and Trust Compared

Skinport and DMarket both run bot-based instant delivery, both charge 0% buyer fees, and both handle CS2 skins. On paper, they look interchangeable. In practice, they serve different traders – and the differences show up the moment you try to sell something or cash out.
Skinport is the EU-regulated, SEPA-withdrawal, CS2-focused marketplace with a Trust Score of 97. DMarket is the multi-game, PayPal-and-crypto platform with a 2% seller fee and a Trust Score of 75. One charges more but gives you a cleaner path to your bank account. The other saves you money per trade but asks you to work a little harder on the back end.
Here’s where each one actually wins.
Seller fees
This is the single biggest difference, and it matters more the larger your inventory gets.
Skinport charges an 8% seller fee on items under €1,000, dropping to 6% on anything above that threshold. There’s also a 2% private sale rate, but that’s for direct trades between users, not the standard marketplace experience. Buyers pay nothing – listed price is checkout price, no hidden markups.
DMarket advertises seller fees “as low as 2%” for CS2 items, and that rate holds on standard-value skins. But there’s a catch: low-value items (below a price threshold DMarket doesn’t publicly specify) can incur fees up to 10%. For Dota 2, TF2, and Rust items, the rate is a flat 5%. Buyers also pay 0%.
The headline “2% vs 8%” is real for mid-to-high-value CS2 skins. On a $100 skin, a Skinport seller nets about $92. A DMarket seller nets about $98. That’s $6 per item – which adds up fast if you’re liquidating a whole inventory.
But the gap narrows on low-value items. If you’re listing a bunch of $2-5 skins, DMarket’s tiered fee structure can push your effective rate well above the advertised 2%. Skinport’s flat 8% is at least predictable.

Fee Type
Skinport
DMarket

Seller fee (standard)
8%
~2% (CS2)

Seller fee (high-value)
6% (>€1,000)
~2% (CS2)

Seller fee (low-value)
8%
Up to 10%

Seller fee (Dota 2/TF2/Rust)
N/A
5%

Buyer fee
0%
0%

Trade fee
N/A
~2.5%

Visit Site
Visit Site

Delivery and trade model
Both platforms use bot-based instant delivery, so neither requires you to wait around for a human seller to accept your trade. You buy a skin, the bot sends it, done. On Skinport, sellers deposit skins into the platform’s Steam bots upfront – the 7-day Valve trade hold has already passed by the time a buyer sees the listing. DMarket runs a similar model where listed items are immediately available.
The practical difference is minimal for buyers. You click buy, you get your skin. Neither platform requires a browser extension, and failed trades auto-refund on both.
Where the models start to diverge is on the seller side. Skinport sellers deposit items and wait for a buyer to purchase at the listed price – it’s straightforward consignment. DMarket also offers a trade function (distinct from buy/sell) with a separate ~2.5% fee, which lets you swap items directly without going through the cash cycle. If you’re the kind of trader who rotates through skins rather than cashing out, that trade feature saves a step.
Cashout and withdrawals
This is where Skinport’s simplicity becomes a double-edged sword.
Skinport offers exactly one withdrawal method: SEPA bank transfer. Zero withdrawal fee, 1-3 business days to arrive. If you have a European bank account, this is clean and cheap. If you don’t – if you’re in the US, Asia, or anywhere SEPA doesn’t reach – you’re stuck. No PayPal. No crypto withdrawal. No Visa cashout. SEPA or nothing.
DMarket gives you more options. PayPal, crypto, and bank transfers are all available, with fees varying by method (crypto charges blockchain fees, PayPal charges standard PayPal rates). For traders outside Europe, DMarket is dramatically more accessible. PayPal availability alone is a major differentiator – most CS2 marketplaces don’t offer it.
If you’re in the EU with a SEPA-compatible bank, Skinport’s zero-fee withdrawal is hard to beat. Everywhere else, DMarket wins on flexibility by a wide margin.
Traffic and liquidity

Metric
Skinport
DMarket

Monthly visits
~3.5M
~2.2M

Active listings
~3-3.5M
Not disclosed

Games supported
CS2 (some Dota 2, Rust, TF2)
CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2

Trustpilot rating
4.8-4.9 / 5 (35,000+ reviews)
4.0 / 5 (21,000+ reviews)

Visit Site
Visit Site

Skinport pulls ~3.5M monthly visits and lists roughly 3-3.5M items – making it the largest CS2 marketplace in Europe by listing count. That volume means your skins sell faster, especially in the popular $10-200 range.
DMarket’s ~2.2M visits are spread across four games. For CS2 specifically, the buyer pool is smaller than Skinport’s. But if you trade Dota 2, Rust, or TF2 items, DMarket is one of the few major Western marketplaces with meaningful depth in those titles. There’s no point listing your Dota 2 arcanas on Skinport – the audience isn’t there.
Trust Score and company structure
Skinport holds a Trust Score of 97, the highest among CS2 trading platforms on Tested.gg. The operator is Skinport GmbH, registered in Stuttgart, Germany (HRB 764879) – a real German limited liability company with EU consumer protection obligations. They’ve been operating since 2019, maintain a 4.8-4.9 Trustpilot rating across 35,000+ reviews, and have never had a major security incident. KYC is required for all seller withdrawals with no small-amount exemption.
DMarket’s Trust Score is 75. The operator is DMarket Inc., incorporated in Wilmington, Delaware, with an operational hub in Kyiv, Ukraine. Founded in 2017, the platform has processed over 107M cashouts. The Trustpilot rating sits at 4.0 with 21,000+ reviews – 71% five-star but 15% one-star, a notably higher negative rate than Skinport’s. The most common complaint in negative reviews involves AML-triggered account locks with reported resolution times of 3-10 months.
That TrustScore gap matters. Skinport’s German GmbH means EU regulatory oversight and a clear legal escalation path. DMarket’s Delaware incorporation is a US holding structure, but the operational team is Ukraine-based – which adds geopolitical considerations and can complicate support escalation for large disputes.
User sentiment
What Skinport users praise: instant delivery, 0% buyer fee, clean UI, EU compliance, consistent support, and active Trustpilot engagement.
What Skinport users complain about: KYC delays (the most common issue – can take days and blocks withdrawals during review), bot sniping of underpriced listings, SEPA-only cashout, and a 100-item listing cap.
What DMarket users praise: fast transactions, competitive pricing vs Steam Market, instant delivery, large multi-game inventory, PayPal availability, and wide payment selection.
What DMarket users complain about: AML-triggered account locks (the dominant negative theme – with funds frozen for months), poor communication during lockouts, payout rate changes after trade execution, and deposit processing failures.
The pattern is clear. Skinport’s complaints are mostly about limitations (KYC waits, SEPA only). DMarket’s complaints are more structural – accounts locked with funds inaccessible for extended periods is a fundamentally different kind of problem.
Who should use Skinport
Use Skinport if you:

Have a SEPA-compatible bank account
Trade primarily CS2 skins
Want the highest Trust Score in the category (97)
Buy more than you sell (0% buyer fee, and the 8% seller fee doesn’t affect purchases)
Prefer a predictable flat fee over variable rates
Value EU legal protections and regulatory oversight

Who should use DMarket
Use DMarket if you:

Need PayPal or crypto withdrawals (SEPA isn’t an option for you)
Trade across multiple games (CS2, Dota 2, Rust, TF2)
Sell regularly and want to keep the 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items
Use the trade feature to rotate skins without cashing out
Are comfortable with the platform’s AML review risk

The bottom line
For CS2 buyers in Europe, Skinport is the stronger platform. Zero buyer fees, instant delivery, a Trust Score of 97, and a straight line from sold item to your bank account via SEPA. The 8% seller fee is the premium you pay for that simplicity.
For sellers chasing lower fees, multi-game traders, or anyone outside the SEPA zone, DMarket makes more financial sense. The 2% seller fee on standard CS2 items is genuinely competitive, and PayPal/crypto withdrawals open the platform to a global audience that Skinport’s SEPA-only policy locks out.
Neither platform is universally better. The right choice depends on where your bank is, what games you trade, and whether you’re primarily buying or selling. For the full directory, see all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score on Tested.gg.

Chia sẻ … Xem thêm

CS.MONEY vs Tradeit.gg: CS2 Trading Compared

CS.MONEY and Tradeit.gg are both bot-based CS2 trading platforms where you get instant delivery and don’t have to coordinate with a human seller. Both hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg. But the way they charge you – and the way they let you cash out – couldn’t be more different.
CS.MONEY is the older platform (founded 2015) with the highest traffic in the CS2 trading category at ~7.1M monthly visits. It runs two modes: a trade mode where fees are hidden inside a bid-ask spread, and a market mode with published seller commissions. Tradeit.gg (founded 2017, ~2.9M visits) publishes its fees upfront – 8.5-13% depending on the item – but makes you jump through a two-step cashout process that takes 8-10 days.
Same destination, very different roads.
How the fee models work
This is the core difference, and it takes more than a glance to understand.
CS.MONEY operates in two modes. In trade mode, you swap skins against the platform’s bot inventory. There’s no stated commission – the fee is baked into the spread between what CS.MONEY pays for your item and what they sell it for. That spread typically runs 5-10% on standard items and compresses to around 3% on items over $1,000. You never see a “fee” line item; the price you’re offered is just lower than market value. In market mode (P2P listings), the fees are transparent: 5% on items under $1,000, 3% on items at $1,000 or above. Buyers pay 0% in both modes.
Tradeit.gg publishes a seller fee of 8.5-13%, varying by item type and price. What you see is what you get charged. There’s also an insta-sell option that pays about 83% of market value – higher than most competitors (Skinvault pays around 40%, Swap.gg around 80-85%). On the deposit side, crypto is free (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC), while card and PayPal deposits carry a 3.1% surcharge.
The practical math on a $100 CS2 skin:

Sell method
CS.MONEY nets (est.)
Tradeit.gg nets (est.)

Standard sale
$90-95 (trade mode) or $95 (market mode)
$87-92 (8.5-13%)

High-value ($1,200)
~$1,164 (3% market mode)
$1,044-1,098 (8.5-13%)

Insta-sell
N/A
~$83 (83% of market)

Visit Site
Visit Site

CS.MONEY’s market mode (5%/3%) undercuts Tradeit.gg on every price point. The trade mode spread is less predictable but still typically beats Tradeit.gg’s published rates. The one area where Tradeit.gg wins is if you need instant liquidity without waiting for a buyer – the 83% insta-sell rate gets you paid immediately.
The cashout problem
Here’s where Tradeit.gg’s model gets complicated.
CS.MONEY lets you sell in market mode and withdraw directly via Visa. Trade mode is different – selling into trade mode gives you site balance that can only be used to buy other skins. You’d need to buy an item and then sell it in market mode to eventually reach a withdrawable state. But market mode itself has a cleaner path to cash.
Tradeit.gg uses a two-step balance system that trips up new users constantly. When you sell a skin, you get “trade balance” – site credit. Trade balance cannot be withdrawn. To convert it to cash, you buy items with your trade balance, then sell those items. Only the proceeds from that second sale become “revenue balance,” which is the only balance you can actually withdraw. On top of that, all revenue balance is locked for a 7-day protection window (fraud prevention, non-negotiable), followed by 1-2 days for bank transfer processing. Total time from first sale to cash in hand: 8-10 days minimum.
Cash deposits on Tradeit.gg can’t be refunded to your card either – you have to trade first. If you deposit $50 with your Visa and change your mind, that money has to go through the platform’s trade cycle before you can get it back.
Compare that to Skinport, where sellers get paid via SEPA in 1-3 business days, or DMarket with PayPal withdrawals. Tradeit.gg’s 8-10 day cycle is the slowest among major CS2 trading sites.
Delivery speed and trade experience
Both platforms deliver skins instantly via bots – no P2P waiting, no seller coordination. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish exact delivery times, but the experience is essentially immediate since you’re buying from the platform’s own inventory. Tradeit.gg advertises 8-10 seconds per trade, which matches what users report.
CS.MONEY’s standout feature is its 3D skin preview tool. You can inspect skins from every angle before buying – float values, wear patterns, sticker positions. It’s the kind of feature that makes browsing feel more like shopping than scrolling through a spreadsheet. The UI is polished and the inventory is deep, powered by that 7.1M monthly traffic.
Tradeit.gg’s interface is cleaner and more beginner-friendly. The trade flow is straightforward if you’re just buying – it’s the selling and cashout side that requires the learning curve. The insta-sell feature is useful for users who want to dump items quickly without listing them and waiting.
Neither platform has a mobile app. Both require desktop browsers.
Multi-game support

Game
CS.MONEY
Tradeit.gg

CS2
Yes
Yes

Rust
No
Yes

TF2
No
Yes

Visit Site
Visit Site

CS.MONEY is CS2-only. Tradeit.gg supports CS2, Rust, and TF2. If you trade across titles – especially Rust, which has a growing skin economy – Tradeit.gg gives you one platform for everything. For CS2-only traders, this distinction doesn’t matter.
Traffic and liquidity
CS.MONEY’s ~7.1M monthly visits make it the highest-traffic CS2 trading platform, which means your items are seen by more potential buyers and sell faster. Tradeit.gg at ~2.9M visits has about 40% of CS.MONEY’s traffic but spreads it across three games. For CS2-specific liquidity, the gap is significant.
Tradeit.gg lists roughly 350,000 active skins. CS.MONEY doesn’t publish listing counts, but reviews describe it as “one of the largest inventories in CS2.” Both platforms benefit from the bot model – since the platform holds inventory, everything listed is actually available for immediate purchase. No ghost listings, no waiting for a seller to come online.
Trust and reputation
Both platforms hold a Trust Score of 85 on Tested.gg, but their reputation profiles look different.
CS.MONEY has a 4.6 Trustpilot rating across ~7,774 reviews. It’s been running since 2015 – the oldest major dedicated CS2 trading platform – and is operated by CS Virtual Trade Ltd. out of Limassol, Cyprus. The Trustpilot score looks solid, but the Reviews.io rating tells a different story: 3.4 out of 5 on 58 reviews. That gap suggests the Trustpilot audience may skew toward satisfied users. Common complaints include the non-transparent spread (users don’t realize how much they’re paying until after the trade), and the 2024 removal of the deposit bonus that was a key draw for many traders.
Tradeit.gg has a 4.7 Trustpilot rating across 20,574 reviews – the largest review count in the CS2 trading category. The operator is Tradeit.gg LLC, registered in Lewes, Delaware. However, the Reviews.io score is a stark 1.4 out of 5 on 18 reviews. Small sample, but an extreme gap. Common complaints are the 7-day withdrawal delay, the confusing two-step cashout system, and the 3.1% card/PayPal deposit fee.
Both are legitimate, long-running operators. CS.MONEY has more brand visibility through esports sponsorships (BLAST Premier presence, major CS2 events). Tradeit.gg sponsors Team Vitality – those long-term commitments signal financial stability.
Deposit options

Deposit method
CS.MONEY
Tradeit.gg

Credit/debit card
Yes
Yes (3.1% fee)

PayPal
Info unavailable
Yes (3.1% fee)

Crypto (0% fee)
Info unavailable
Yes (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC)

iDEAL / Bancontact
No
Yes

Visit Site
Visit Site

Tradeit.gg’s 0% crypto deposit fee is a meaningful advantage. If you fund your account with USDT or BTC, you avoid the 3.1% surcharge entirely. For a $500 deposit, that’s $15.50 saved. CS.MONEY’s deposit methods are less clearly documented – the platform returned a 403 during our March 2026 research, so exact current options aren’t independently verified.
Who should use CS.MONEY
Use CS.MONEY if you:

Want the largest buyer pool in CS2 (7.1M monthly visits)
Value the 3D skin preview for inspecting items before buying
Plan to use market mode (5%/3% published fees are competitive)
Trade CS2 exclusively and don’t need multi-game support
Prefer a platform with 10+ years of operating history

Who should use Tradeit.gg
Use Tradeit.gg if you:

Trade Rust or TF2 in addition to CS2
Deposit with crypto and want to avoid all deposit fees
Need the insta-sell feature for quick liquidity (~83% of market value)
Want fully transparent, published fee rates (even if they’re higher)
Don’t mind the 8-10 day cashout cycle

The bottom line
CS.MONEY wins on traffic, skin preview tools, and market mode fees. If you’re a CS2-only trader who uses market mode, the 5%/3% commission is competitive – lower than Tradeit.gg’s 8.5-13% range. The trade mode spread is harder to evaluate, but most users report 5-10% on standard items.
Tradeit.gg wins on multi-game support, deposit flexibility (0% crypto), and fee transparency. You always know exactly what you’re paying. The 8-10 day cashout is the biggest drawback – if you need cash fast, this isn’t the platform. But if you’re a crypto user who trades across CS2, Rust, and TF2, the zero-fee deposits offset some of the higher seller commission.
Both score 85 on Trust Score. Both deliver instantly via bots. The choice comes down to whether you prioritize cost efficiency and speed (CS.MONEY market mode) or fee transparency and multi-game flexibility (Tradeit.gg). See all CS2 trading sites ranked by Trust Score for the full picture.

Chia sẻ … Xem thêm